[comp.sys.mac.digest] Info-Mac Digest V6 #113

Info-Mac-Request@SUMEX-AIM.STANFORD.EDU ("Lance Nakata, Jon Pugh, Bill Lipa") (12/19/88)

Info-Mac Digest             Sun, 18 Dec 88       Volume 6 : Issue 113 

Today's Topics:
                          Adobe Screen Fonts
                        Conceits... Urgent...
                            Converter.hqx
                            JoliWrite V2.0
                      nVIR Patching of Resources
                         PF keys on a VT100.
                              Randomizer
                          SCSI-Parker1.1.hqx
                           SFScrollinit.hqx
                    Stevie vi clone for Macintosh.
                  Switching systems on a hard disk 
                     System 6.0.2 Change History 
                      Usenet Mac Digest V4 #134
                      Usenet Mac Digest V4 #135


The Info-Mac archives are available (via anonymous FTP) in the
<INFO-MAC> directory at SUMEX-2060.Stanford.Edu.

Please send articles and binaries to Info-Mac@SUMEX-AIM.Stanford.Edu.
Send administrative mail to Info-Mac-Request@SUMEX-AIM.Stanford.Edu.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Sun, 18 Dec 88 22:56:24 EST
From: paisley@mte.ncsu.edu (Mike)
Subject: Adobe Screen Fonts

I've gotten a number of screen fonts from Adobe's forum on CompuServe.  
For those who don't know, CompuServe is a commercial (i.e., for $$) 
communications service.  You call in through various ways, TeleNet, TymeNet, 
or CompuServe's own network, and you're connected to a number of services.  I 
won't describe them all, so as to avoid being an advertisement for them.  One 
of the more useful services is user groups.  People place messages for public 
view, similar to INFO-MAC, so that anyone can comment.  Also, they keep 
collections of files (similar to INFO-MAC's archives) for users to download.  
The user groups are often tied to vendors, which is an advantage for their 
customers, but can't be duplicated here, because of the non-commercial nature
of this network.  The disadvantage is cost, which can be high, but scales 
directly with use. 

For those interested and with Compu$erve accounts its just GO ADOBE.  They've
got screen fonts in both Mac and IBM formats, and alot of other info on
PostScript, Illustrator, etc.  They have screen fonts for just about all of
their fonts, with a few exceptions.  The exceptions are for fonts like Lucida,
because Bigelow and Holmes (the licensor) doesn't allow it.  I personally
can't see their point, because I'm not terribly sure of the impact of someone
with only an Imagewriter using their fonts without a license will have on the
DTP market, but that's their privelege.  I've heard you can order a disk for
$50 and get screen fonts for (just about) everything that they distribute, but
haven't done that myself. 

I've been using the screen fonts from Adobe for some time now, though not with 
Expressionist.  I've been happy with them on several fronts: (1) they're 
better looking than Apple's (Times is spaced out more a little more, giving it 
an improved appearance, in my humble opinion.  Also, Symbol has much improved 
line spacing and so doesn't mess things up AS MUCH as Apple's version), (2)
they've got the style fonts included (i.e., the TRUE bold, and italic and bold
italic versions), and (3) in some cases, more sizes (e.g., Times includes 5
and 7 point sizes, which is important if you like to sub/superscript more than
one level.). 

There are a few cavaets though (aren't there ALWAYS?):

Point (1) means that some of your older documents might get mussed up alot, 
especially if you used many spaces and tabs to push text around to place it 
where you want it.  This happens very rarely if you do it CORRECTLY, i.e., 
with hanging indents, etc.  But then some folks don't seem to have the time or
the inclination, therefore those folks may be in for a bit of work on old,
heavily formatted documents. 

Point (2) has impact on several areas, some good, some bad.  First the bad 
news.  All the style fonts, in their various sizes take up alot more disk 
space.  Those users without a great deal of free disk space could be in
trouble if they like alot of different fonts.  Suitcase or Font/DA Juggler can
be a BIG help here.  Also, when you go to install these new fonts, you MUST
remove the old Times font before you put in the new one.  You can't just add
the style fonts, and get it right.  The old font number bugaboo will bite you,
and you'll give up the disk space without having the benefits. 

One other point of bad news.  Apple insists on "updating" the screen fonts
when it releases system updates.  This means that your collection of high
quality screen fonts will be selectively corrupted by Apple's ideas of a good 
screen font.  Thus you'll have to reinstall the fonts, after you've used
Installer to update your system.  

   FLAME ON

The whole idea of Installer was to avoid this sort of thing, so why Apple
insists on this, I'll never understand. I suppose having an option to "update"
the screen fonts would confuse the user. Apple seems insistent on insulating
the user from the technology of the computer by not giving them any choice, or 
ever telling them anything about what is going on under the hood. Steve Jobs
strikes again (from beyond the grave, so to speak). 

   FLAME OFF

The good news is that you'll get better spacing on your output as well as
higher readability on the screen.  A good test to see the difference (and 
check if you've installed them correctly), is to type a phrase with a lower
case "f" and then italicize it. If you get a slanted "f", then it didn't work,
but if you got a nicely curved, readable "f", then you've got the italic
screen font working.  The differences are there for the bold, and bold italic,
but they're more subtle. You can forego the style fonts, but if you've got the
space, or if you're picky about appearance, you won't regret it.  (The more I
do this sort of thing, the more I find out that the font design-types really
do know about this stuff.)  

By the way, the style fonts I've included have been marked with a period at
the beginning of the name, so that they won't appear in the font menu of your
applications (you will be able to see them in the Font/DA mover menus).  This
helps reduce the clutter, and also prevents you from selecting the Times
Italic font, and then selecting Italic from the Style menu.  If you've
installed the fonts correctly, when you select the Italic style from the menu,
the Mac will switch to the Italic version of the font. This is really what the
LaserWriter does anyway, which explains why italicizing or bolding Symbol
appears onscreen, but then it doesn't print that way.  This happens because
there is no Symbol Italic, or Symbol Bold font installed in printer.  Now all 
we need to do is convince Adobe that bold or italic symbols ARE in fact 
useful, and maybe it will change.

Finally, Apple's version of Symbol has an extra size (9 pt) compared to 
Adobe's version.  This is supposedly because 10, 12, 14, 18, and 24 point 
sizes are the standard screen font sizes that Adobe produces (except for Times
and Helvetica, so much for standards).  Which leaves one wondering if there is 
a way out of this dilemma.  If anyone has any experience with the FontSizer 
program, which generates screen fonts from a PostScript printer, I'd love to 
hear from you.  I've heard it is excellent for producing good screen fonts in 
larger sizes, but I'm wondering about smaller sizes (e.g., 7, 8, & 9 point).

   FLAME ON

All of this would be moot, if Apple had produced a display technology that was
not display dependent.  This they actually used to claim, but its only sort
of, kinda display independent.  Display PostScript would be a natural, but it
isn't absolutely necessary for this.  After all TeX (and LaTeX) have screen 
previewers that run on everything from high resolution workstation screens to 
TEXT-ONLY terminals.  All Apple had to do was make the display appear as close
to the output as possible, not screwup the output based on the display, and
how many screen fonts/sizes the poor user has in the system he's using for
printing. 

   FLAME OFF

Anyways, the next two mail messages will contain the screen fonts that I've 
described for Symbol and Times.  If there is interest, I'll upload others.

				Michael J. Paisley
				PAISLEY@NCSUMTE.BITNET
				PAISLEY@MTE.NCSU.EDU
				PAISLEY%MTE@NCSUVX.NCSU.EDU

[I'm holding off on posting these fonts until the legality of doing so is
 settled.        - Bill]

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 12 Dec 1988 19:54 EST
From: Pedro Sepulveda J. <PSEPULVE@USACHVM1>
Subject: Conceits... Urgent...

    Hi Networkers...!

              Can  anyone  helps  us to  define  some  terms...?.
    Please, these are:

         1. Resources INIT and CODE.
         2. System file.
         3. HyperCard stack.
         4. XCMD resource.
         5. Master training disks.
         6. System folder.
         7. Scrapbook and Note Pad files.
         8. Desktop.
         9. ID for a resource CODE.
        10. CODE segments.
        11. to "launch" an application.
        12. RTS instruction.
        13. cdev and rdev files.
        14. to "get rid"
        15. Finder.
        16. Multifinder.


              We need  explain these terms to  Mac's beginners...
    It's very urgent...


                      THANKS IN ADVANCE

P.S.: If you want, reply us directly...

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 8 Oct 88 16:00:04 CDT
From: jdm@emx.utexas.edu (James Meiss)
Subject: Converter.hqx

	Converter is a modest desk accessory I wrote to help
me enter my expenses from overseas trips into Dollars
and Sense. At that time D&S didn't support the clipboard, so
I made this little calculator post its result to the event que. I
still find it more useful to use in entering repeated conversions than
the traditional calculator. It works in just about every application,
except Excel, which doesn't activate its "entry" window properly.
	The "auto enter" feature is converter's main virtue,though it 
also saves the exchange rate in a STR# for next time. You can also 
change the number of significant figures by changing the second 
STR# resource.
	Click on the copywrite notice for a help screen. This is free,
in thanks to all who've posted their programs to the net.


[Archived as <INFO-MAC>DA-CONVERTER.HQX]

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 09 Oct 88 15:50:45 HFH
From: JORDA%FRSUN12.BITNET@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU
Subject: JoliWrite V2.0

Date: 09 October 1988, 15:49:56 HFH
From: Michel Jorda                                   JORDA    at FRSUN12
To:   TONAME                    TOPHONE              INFO-MAC-REQUEST@SUMEX-AIM.
This is V2.0 of JoliWrite, US version, compressed by Stuffit then BinHex.
   I will keep the file on my mainframe disk until you can test. Of  course  I
try to download the file on my mac, all is perfectly ok.
   Please test, the tell me how it is. If you can store it on Macserve..
   Regards,

Info-Mac-Request@SUMEX-AIM.STANFORD.EDU ("Lance Nakata, Jon Pugh, Bill Lipa") (12/19/88)

Info-Mac Digest             Sun, 18 Dec 88       Volume 6 : Issue 113 

Today's Topics:
                          Adobe Screen Fonts
                        Conceits... Urgent...
                            Converter.hqx
                            JoliWrite V2.0
                      nVIR Patching of Resources
                         PF keys on a VT100.
                              Randomizer
                          SCSI-Parker1.1.hqx
                           SFScrollinit.hqx
                    Stevie vi clone for Macintosh.
                  Switching systems on a hard disk 
                     System 6.0.2 Change History 
                      Usenet Mac Digest V4 #134
                      Usenet Mac Digest V4 #135


The Info-Mac archives are available (via anonymous FTP) in the
<INFO-MAC> directory at SUMEX-2060.Stanford.Edu.

Please send articles and binaries to Info-Mac@SUMEX-AIM.Stanford.Edu.
Send administrative mail to Info-Mac-Request@SUMEX-AIM.Stanford.Edu.

[NOTE:  This is a resend of digest V6 #113, which was truncated by
	sendmail.]

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Sun, 18 Dec 88 22:56:24 EST
From: paisley@mte.ncsu.edu (Mike)
Subject: Adobe Screen Fonts

I've gotten a number of screen fonts from Adobe's forum on CompuServe.  
For those who don't know, CompuServe is a commercial (i.e., for $$) 
communications service.  You call in through various ways, TeleNet, TymeNet, 
or CompuServe's own network, and you're connected to a number of services.  I 
won't describe them all, so as to avoid being an advertisement for them.  One 
of the more useful services is user groups.  People place messages for public 
view, similar to INFO-MAC, so that anyone can comment.  Also, they keep 
collections of files (similar to INFO-MAC's archives) for users to download.  
The user groups are often tied to vendors, which is an advantage for their 
customers, but can't be duplicated here, because of the non-commercial nature
of this network.  The disadvantage is cost, which can be high, but scales 
directly with use. 

For those interested and with Compu$erve accounts its just GO ADOBE.  They've
got screen fonts in both Mac and IBM formats, and alot of other info on
PostScript, Illustrator, etc.  They have screen fonts for just about all of
their fonts, with a few exceptions.  The exceptions are for fonts like Lucida,
because Bigelow and Holmes (the licensor) doesn't allow it.  I personally
can't see their point, because I'm not terribly sure of the impact of someone
with only an Imagewriter using their fonts without a license will have on the
DTP market, but that's their privelege.  I've heard you can order a disk for
$50 and get screen fonts for (just about) everything that they distribute, but
haven't done that myself. 

I've been using the screen fonts from Adobe for some time now, though not with 
Expressionist.  I've been happy with them on several fronts: (1) they're 
better looking than Apple's (Times is spaced out more a little more, giving it 
an improved appearance, in my humble opinion.  Also, Symbol has much improved 
line spacing and so doesn't mess things up AS MUCH as Apple's version), (2)
they've got the style fonts included (i.e., the TRUE bold, and italic and bold
italic versions), and (3) in some cases, more sizes (e.g., Times includes 5
and 7 point sizes, which is important if you like to sub/superscript more than
one level.). 

There are a few cavaets though (aren't there ALWAYS?):

Point (1) means that some of your older documents might get mussed up alot, 
especially if you used many spaces and tabs to push text around to place it 
where you want it.  This happens very rarely if you do it CORRECTLY, i.e., 
with hanging indents, etc.  But then some folks don't seem to have the time or
the inclination, therefore those folks may be in for a bit of work on old,
heavily formatted documents. 

Point (2) has impact on several areas, some good, some bad.  First the bad 
news.  All the style fonts, in their various sizes take up alot more disk 
space.  Those users without a great deal of free disk space could be in
trouble if they like alot of different fonts.  Suitcase or Font/DA Juggler can
be a BIG help here.  Also, when you go to install these new fonts, you MUST
remove the old Times font before you put in the new one.  You can't just add
the style fonts, and get it right.  The old font number bugaboo will bite you,
and you'll give up the disk space without having the benefits. 

One other point of bad news.  Apple insists on "updating" the screen fonts
when it releases system updates.  This means that your collection of high
quality screen fonts will be selectively corrupted by Apple's ideas of a good 
screen font.  Thus you'll have to reinstall the fonts, after you've used
Installer to update your system.  

   FLAME ON

The whole idea of Installer was to avoid this sort of thing, so why Apple
insists on this, I'll never understand. I suppose having an option to "update"
the screen fonts would confuse the user. Apple seems insistent on insulating
the user from the technology of the computer by not giving them any choice, or 
ever telling them anything about what is going on under the hood. Steve Jobs
strikes again (from beyond the grave, so to speak). 

   FLAME OFF

The good news is that you'll get better spacing on your output as well as
higher readability on the screen.  A good test to see the difference (and 
check if you've installed them correctly), is to type a phrase with a lower
case "f" and then italicize it. If you get a slanted "f", then it didn't work,
but if you got a nicely curved, readable "f", then you've got the italic
screen font working.  The differences are there for the bold, and bold italic,
but they're more subtle. You can forego the style fonts, but if you've got the
space, or if you're picky about appearance, you won't regret it.  (The more I
do this sort of thing, the more I find out that the font design-types really
do know about this stuff.)  

By the way, the style fonts I've included have been marked with a period at
the beginning of the name, so that they won't appear in the font menu of your
applications (you will be able to see them in the Font/DA mover menus).  This
helps reduce the clutter, and also prevents you from selecting the Times
Italic font, and then selecting Italic from the Style menu.  If you've
installed the fonts correctly, when you select the Italic style from the menu,
the Mac will switch to the Italic version of the font. This is really what the
LaserWriter does anyway, which explains why italicizing or bolding Symbol
appears onscreen, but then it doesn't print that way.  This happens because
there is no Symbol Italic, or Symbol Bold font installed in printer.  Now all 
we need to do is convince Adobe that bold or italic symbols ARE in fact 
useful, and maybe it will change.

Finally, Apple's version of Symbol has an extra size (9 pt) compared to 
Adobe's version.  This is supposedly because 10, 12, 14, 18, and 24 point 
sizes are the standard screen font sizes that Adobe produces (except for Times
and Helvetica, so much for standards).  Which leaves one wondering if there is 
a way out of this dilemma.  If anyone has any experience with the FontSizer 
program, which generates screen fonts from a PostScript printer, I'd love to 
hear from you.  I've heard it is excellent for producing good screen fonts in 
larger sizes, but I'm wondering about smaller sizes (e.g., 7, 8, & 9 point).

   FLAME ON

All of this would be moot, if Apple had produced a display technology that was
not display dependent.  This they actually used to claim, but its only sort
of, kinda display independent.  Display PostScript would be a natural, but it
isn't absolutely necessary for this.  After all TeX (and LaTeX) have screen 
previewers that run on everything from high resolution workstation screens to 
TEXT-ONLY terminals.  All Apple had to do was make the display appear as close
to the output as possible, not screwup the output based on the display, and
how many screen fonts/sizes the poor user has in the system he's using for
printing. 

   FLAME OFF

Anyways, the next two mail messages will contain the screen fonts that I've 
described for Symbol and Times.  If there is interest, I'll upload others.

				Michael J. Paisley
				PAISLEY@NCSUMTE.BITNET
				PAISLEY@MTE.NCSU.EDU
				PAISLEY%MTE@NCSUVX.NCSU.EDU

[I'm holding off on posting these fonts until the legality of doing so is
 settled.        - Bill]

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 12 Dec 1988 19:54 EST
From: Pedro Sepulveda J. <PSEPULVE@USACHVM1>
Subject: Conceits... Urgent...

    Hi Networkers...!

              Can  anyone  helps  us to  define  some  terms...?.
    Please, these are:

         1. Resources INIT and CODE.
         2. System file.
         3. HyperCard stack.
         4. XCMD resource.
         5. Master training disks.
         6. System folder.
         7. Scrapbook and Note Pad files.
         8. Desktop.
         9. ID for a resource CODE.
        10. CODE segments.
        11. to "launch" an application.
        12. RTS instruction.
        13. cdev and rdev files.
        14. to "get rid"
        15. Finder.
        16. Multifinder.


              We need  explain these terms to  Mac's beginners...
    It's very urgent...


                      THANKS IN ADVANCE

P.S.: If you want, reply us directly...

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 8 Oct 88 16:00:04 CDT
From: jdm@emx.utexas.edu (James Meiss)
Subject: Converter.hqx

	Converter is a modest desk accessory I wrote to help
me enter my expenses from overseas trips into Dollars
and Sense. At that time D&S didn't support the clipboard, so
I made this little calculator post its result to the event que. I
still find it more useful to use in entering repeated conversions than
the traditional calculator. It works in just about every application,
except Excel, which doesn't activate its "entry" window properly.
	The "auto enter" feature is converter's main virtue,though it 
also saves the exchange rate in a STR# for next time. You can also 
change the number of significant figures by changing the second 
STR# resource.
	Click on the copywrite notice for a help screen. This is free,
in thanks to all who've posted their programs to the net.


[Archived as <INFO-MAC>DA-CONVERTER.HQX]

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 09 Oct 88 15:50:45 HFH
From: JORDA%FRSUN12.BITNET@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU
Subject: JoliWrite V2.0

Date: 09 October 1988, 15:49:56 HFH
From: Michel Jorda                                   JORDA    at FRSUN12
To:   TONAME                    TOPHONE              INFO-MAC-REQUEST@SUMEX-AIM

This is V2.0 of JoliWrite, US version, compressed by Stuffit then
BinHex.  I will keep the file on my mainframe disk until you can test.
Of course I try to download the file on my mac, all is perfectly ok.
Please test, the tell me how it is. If you can store it on Macserve..

   Regards,

   Michel Jorda,
   Cystic fibrosis interest group, Lyon, France.

[Archived as <INFO-MAC>UTILITY-JOLIWRITE20.HQX]

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 15 Dec 1988 13:10 CST
From: Joe McMahon <XRJDM@SCFVM>
Subject: nVIR Patching of Resources

Laird J. Heal writes:
>nVIR patches CODE 0 in infected APPLs to point to CODE 256 resource.  It
>does not always do this; I think that the ones that were not patched had
>only two or three CODE resources.

This is because the known strains of nVIR are not too bright and miss the
bad return code that they get when they try to modify protected code
resources. Applications written in THINK C, for instance.

Also, there are now at least two strains on nVIR out there. Virus Rx
doesn't detect either, and of course both it and Interferon are
susceptible to infection. Virus Rx monitors itself, and will "commit
suicide" if it finds that it has been modified. I don't know if
Interferon does anything similar.

In either case, the virus DOES check for an nVIR 10 resource in the
System file. If it finds it, it will remove itself from applications
as they run. You can add this with ResEdit, which will make the System
look infected to Interferon, but the neatest way to do it (courtesy of
Steve Brecher) is to create it in a separate resource file and then to
open that file with Suitcase. This makes it look like it's in the System
file's resources, fooling nVIR.

--- Joe M.

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 17 Dec 88 15:45 EDT
From: HENRY YEE <HENRY@atc.bendix.com>
Subject: PF keys on a VT100.

I don't know if I can help you with your MacKermit, but if you are
interested in how to do it in MacTerminal or Red Ryder 9.4, I'll try
to explain.  In MacTerminal there is a pull-down menu for the keypad.  
You just pull down, move the arrow to the desired key, and release the 
mouse button.  

In Red Ryder there is a menu called special.  In it you normally
select the GENERAL STATUS BAR.  If you are connected to a VAX you may
select the VT100 STATUS BAR.  There you will find a two-dimensional
version of the keypad.  You can click on any key you want and the
keypad won't disappear. 

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 10 Oct 88 17:24:12 PDT
From: PUGH@NMFECC.ARPA
Subject: Randomizer

I noticed that I had the order of some of the resources wrong in
the posted version of Randomizer.  It caused Randomizer to
perform it's function in a manner different than described in the
documentation.  Such is life with no Q&A department.  Part of the
reason it's free I suppose. 

Randomizer copies files at system startup.  It makes any
configuration file a variable thing (assuming you have disk space
for a couple of different copies). It works ideally in
conjunction with startupscreens (on ALL Macintosh models) and
startupsounds (with either SoundInit or SoundMaster).  It can
change any other file with merely a flick of ResEdit. 

The documentation has been expanded upon and reformatted.  That's
what takes all the time.  

Look for Randomizer in Robert C. Eckhardt's new book, The Fully
Powered Macintosh.  He considers it an essential part of the
Macintosh experience, and I agree.  Fabian Ramirez is also a
staunch supporter and one of the people who makes heavy use of
the screen & sound coordination capabilities so that a picture 
shows and accompanying sounds play at startup.  Very cool, Fabe.

Jon

[Archived as <INFO-MAC>INIT-RANDOMIZER.HQX]

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 08 Oct 88 18:18:16 -0700
From: Steve Lemke <decwrl!comdesign!ivucsb!steve@labrea.stanford.edu>
Subject: SCSI-Parker1.1.hqx

Here is the SCSI Parker INIT/CDEV that I mentioned way back when...
Sorry it took so long to send it.  Incidentally, I also have McSink v6.2
if you want it.  I often download stuff from CompuServe, and I'm not sure
if someone (or several people) already send that stuff to you or if you're
interested in getting it.  I was actually hoping that most of the stuff I
used to get from CS would appear in Comp.binaries.mac first.  This stuff,
however, hasn't.  Let me know what your feelings are about all this.

[The more, the merrier]

----- Steve Lemke ------------------- "MS-DOS (OS/2, etc.) - just say no!"
----- Internet: steve@ivucsb.UUCP; lemke@apple.COM   AppleLink:  LEMKE
----- uucp:     pyramid!comdesign!ivucsb!steve       CompuServe: 73627,570
----- alt.uucp: {decwrl!}sun!apple!lemke             GEnie:      S.Lemke

[Archived as <INFO-MAC>CDEV-SCSI-PARKER.HQX]

------------------------------

Date: Sat, 08 Oct 88 18:23:15 -0700
From: Steve Lemke <decwrl!comdesign!ivucsb!steve@labrea.stanford.edu>
Subject: SFScrollinit.hqx

Got this one off of CompuServe, too.  Here's the description:

This is Andy Hertzfeld's SFScrollINIT, modified to have its own icon and to
show its icon on bootup, like a good little INIT should.  Thanks to Paul
Mercer for show init code.

[Archived as <INFO-MAC>INIT-SFSCROLLINIT.HQX]

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 11 Oct 88 20:48:24 EDT
From: earleh@eleazar.Dartmouth.EDU (Earle R. Horton)
Subject: Stevie vi clone for Macintosh.

     This is a binary distribution of "Stevie, a vi clone" which I
obtained from comp.sources.unix and ported to the Macintosh environment
in two days.  The documentation which came with the editor is included,
but some familiarity with the UNIX vi editor would be helpful.

     The program as I found it was quite portable, and the system
specific file to make it work on the Macintosh only amounts to between
500 and 600 lines of code.  Stevie doesn't support many of the features of
the real vi, string substitution for example, but it does support quite
a large subset, and DOES know how to do tags, which can be quite helpful
if you are writing C code.

     Don't look for complicated menus, scroll bars, or grow boxes, since
there aren't any.  Don't try to move the cursor around with the mouse,
either, since that would mess up my idea of the vi "Look and Feel."
If you want to resize the window, try 

		":set lines=xx columns=yy"

     If you want to do fancy things with function keys, try Macro Maker.

     Stevie is compiled with Aztec C v 3.6c, and has been tested on a
Macintosh II and a Mac Plus with System 6.0.1.

     If I don't get too many horrible bug reports about the binary's
behavior, I will send the sources to info-mac, too.

[Archived as <INFO-MAC>UTILITY-STEVIE.HQX]

------------------------------

Date: Fri Oct 7 13:37:51 1988 
From: portal!cup.portal.com!Mark_Peter_Cookson@sun.com
Subject: Switching systems on a hard disk 

Ok, here you go, the system switcher (called Blesser in this case).

Mark Cookson

[Archived as <INFO-MAC>UTILITY-SYSTEM-SWITCHER.HQX]

------------------------------

Date: 10 Oct 88 10:05:38 GMT 
From: thecloud@dhw68k.cts.com (Ken McLeod)
Subject: System 6.0.2 Change History 

[Archived as <INFO-MAC>SYSTEM602-CHANGES.HQX]

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 10 Oct 88 08:35 EDT
From: Jeffrey Shulman <SHULMAN@sdr.slb.com>
Subject: Usenet Mac Digest V4 #134

Usenet Mac Digest     Friday, October 7, 1988       Volume 4 : Issue 134 

Today's Topics:
     A bug in FullWrite?
     NeXT generation of Macs
     Plugging in ADB devices
     Re: TCP-IP libraries for Macs and ATs
     Re: Educational Software for 3 year olds
     Re: Seeking info on Rundgren's "HyperCode" OS
     SUN SCSI to MAC II connection help needed
     FontSizer product
     When will MacOS get virtual memory?
     ROMs on SIMMs
     Re: NeXT generation of Macs
     Re: Internal Hard Drive for Mac SE
     Default paper size
     Re: Bus and Address Error insights (was Re: Listing of error...)
     Re: Lacking AppleLink, another Finder Bug
     Re: TCP-IP libraries for Macs and ATs
     Movie script formatting software for Macintosh wanted
     Re: Switching systems on a hard disk
     Re: Weird keyboard problem
     Amber Mac ?!?!
     Re: Standing Mac II Base Unit on end:  is this safe?
     How to Know if You're Running Under MacWorks Plus
     Changing complicated Dialogs into Windows (TechNote 203)
     Wrong <lists.h> in MPW C
     Overflow Checking from within Pascal
     Re: MultiFinder Weirdness
     Sane.h
     Security on A/UX (2 messages)
     Re: problems with ethernet interface
     Showering with Jasmine
     Re: Backdrop INIT Enhancement suggestion
     Re: NFS for the Mac
     Colour TEK4014 emulator needed
     SCSI tape devices.  Who gets the driver?
     GDevices
     A/UX hangs.

[Archived as <INFO-MAC>USENETV4-134.ARC]

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 10 Oct 88 08:36 EDT
From: Jeffrey Shulman <SHULMAN@sdr.slb.com>
Subject: Usenet Mac Digest V4 #135

Usenet Mac Digest     Friday, October 7, 1988       Volume 4 : Issue 135 

Today's Topics:
     68030 Accelerators for Mac II?
     SANE patch
     vi editor for Mac Plus?
     Re: Mac IIx vs. Dove 68030 upgrades; PC boards for SIMMs?
     SliTeX with TeXtures
     Re: NFS for the Mac
     Re: ./etc/APPLE.  No Free Software for
     Re: When will MacOS get virtual memory?
     Re: TCP-IP libraries for Macs and ATs
     MicroPhone II bug
     Re: A bug in FullWrite?
     Re: Arrow cursor (WAS Re: Finder I-Beam)
     Re: Laserwriter SC fonts
     a/ux 1.0.1
     Re: Getting x-ray information into a Mac II
     Re: Moire bug with MS Word 3.02
     Re: When will MacOS get virtual memory?
     TIFF file reader and converter
     Re: resedit
     Re: Educational Software for 3 year olds
     Re: Plugging in ADB devices
     Re: Standing Mac II Base Unit on end:  is this safe?
     Informix's Wingz spreadsheet
     Is Dollars and Sense Compatable with 6.02?
     Change color of active window
     Re: Unexpected $$$ in the mail!
     Re: Let's Talk OCR
     Re: Showering with Jasmine
     Re: MPW Sort Tool Request
     Re: Changing complicated Dialogs into Windows (TechNote 203)
     Re: Parameterizable INITs (was:Dialogs in INITS (LSC3))
     Re: Overflow Checking from within Pasca (2 messages)
     Re: Text editor help
     Re: DA Moving

[Archived as <INFO-MAC>USENETV4-135.ARC]

------------------------------

End of Info-Mac Digest
******************************