stassen@spp2.UUCP (01/16/85)
[] > Is there a need for net.games.rogue anymore? Why not just ^rogue^hack? > -- > Cheryl Nemeth Yes, there still is a need for net.games.rogue. Rogue has not been deleted; it has not been superceded. There is still enough rogue traffic on the net to justify net.games.rogue (though, admittedly, it has been slow for the past week or two). Also, hack is not available for many machines that do have rogue (VMS VAX, IBM PC, ....). I vote for net.games.hack, because hack will very likely continue to generate a lot of articles, and there should be a separate place made for that volume of news. I'm also in favor of another net.games group for questions about Zork and other text-adventure games. There is a consistent flow of these articles in net.games, easily large enough to merit its own group. -- Chris