[comp.laser-printers] Tolerances in the resolution of laser printers

i5f@L.CC.PURDUE.EDU (S Bechtolsheim) (05/27/88)

I once measured a deviation of almost 3% in the resolution
of a laser printer. Discussing this with somebody he mentioned
that he talked to some laser printer manufacturer (don't remember
which one); the manufacturer put the blame on the crystal resposible
for the sweep of the laser beam.

Any comments?! I don't quite believe that because my limited
electronics background (I am a ham radio operator) tells me that
crystals don't deviate in frequency that much.....

Stephan Bechtolsheim
Statistics Dep, Purdue Univ.

henry@utzoo.UUCP (06/07/88)

> I once measured a deviation of almost 3% in the resolution of a laser
> printer...the manufacturer put the blame on the crystal resposible for the
> sweep of the laser beam... crystals don't deviate in frequency that much...

It is indeed the crystal that is to blame, but in a more subtle way than
you think.  The problem is not that the crystal is off its assigned
frequency; the problem is that the assigned frequency is not quite the
right one for the printer!  Rather than get a custom crystal done to
exactly the right frequency, the manufacturer has settled for the nearest
standard crystal.  This is common.

				Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology
				{ihnp4,decvax,uunet!mnetor}!utzoo!henry