[net.dcom] Cheap 1200 bps modems

3435ras@houxb.UUCP (R.SCHREIBMAIER) (10/14/83)

Sorry for the lateness of this article, but I just
started subscribing to this newsgroup.  About a week
ago there was an article summarizing the responses
on cheap 1200 bps modems.  One of the comments received
said that RS-232 was absolutely clear that DCE are wired
with a female DB-25 connector.  This is only half correct.
The part about a female connector on a DCE is correct.
However, believe it or not, even though it gives pin
assignments, NOWHERE in RS-232C does it tell you what
connector to use!  And it hasn't been changed in 14 years!
Incredible!

A small thing, sir, but mine own.

Bob Schreibmaier
AT&T Information Systems
Lincroft, N.J.

rbc@houxw.UUCP (R.CONNAGHAN) (10/17/83)

If referance to DCE ports having female connectors:

I have found the industry to not care if the port
is DCE or DTE, the rule of thumb is if its a box
make it female and if its a cable make it male.

I have read the spec for RS232-C and indead it
dosn't even mention the shape or type of connnector
let alone the gender.

Robert Connaghan
Bell Labs, N.J.
...!houxw!rbc

rf@wu1.UUCP (10/17/83)

Bob Schreibmaier is absolutely correct.  The connector types are
not specified in RS-232.  When RS-232 was written all interested
parties knew what connectors to use, since RS-232 was an EIA
blessing of an AT&T modem standard.

RS-232 also does not specify the timing relationships between
signals, making the design of networks which take their carrier
signals seriously a difficult matter.  EIA has promulgated the
RS-449 standard as a replacement for RS-232, but no-one is
taking it seriously even though it does specify a signalling
standard which would guarantee the operability of 200 foot
cables.  Since a 212 class modem now fits on a rather small card
it is now sensible to build your modems into computers and
terminals and I expect that RS-232 and RS-449 will slooowly fade
away.


				Randolph Fritz
				Western Union Telegraph

jhh@ihldt.UUCP (10/19/83)

I remember hearing back in the distant past that HP had some sort
of basic patent on RS-232 products, and that you could not manufacture
RS-232 products without a license (available for some nominal cost.)
Anyone else remember that?
			John Haller

henry@utzoo.UUCP (Henry Spencer) (10/22/83)

My recollection is that the original Bell standards said that the
modem is supposed to be female, and the thing that connects to it
is supposed to *SUPPLY THE CABLE*, which obviously has to have a
male end to fit the female modem.  In other words, technically your
terminal is supposed to come with a cable that plugs into the terminal
(somehow) and presents a male RS232 end to the outside world.
-- 
				Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology
				{allegra,ihnp4,linus,decvax}!utzoo!henry