[net.dcom] TASI is real!

eds@solar.UUCP (10/25/83)

AT&T Communications (formerly Long Lines) certainly *does* do statistical
multiplexing on voice trunks.  The system is called TASI-E (Time Assignment
Speech Interpolation), and I worked on its development during 1979-81 at
AT&T Bell Laboratories.  TASI-E is the third generation of TASIs, and the
first with more than two systems installed (I think there are >20 in service
now, with 240 trunks on 120 channels each).  Currently, TASI-E is installed
only on undersea cable circuits, where the cost of installing a new circuit
far exceeds the cost of providing another virtual circuit via TASI.  Better
than a 2:1 compression of talkers to long-distance channels is achieved by
exploiting natural gaps in conversation.  [While I'm talking, you're
listening, and even when I'm talking there are pauses.]

Anyway, when a modem call comes into TASI-E, a circuit detects the
echo-suppressor disable tone (2000 Hz for >194 ms.), and does two things:
it removes the 50 ms. of delay from the modem circuit (delay is there to
reduce the front-end clipping of speech bursts while they are being detected
and switched), and it "pins" the trunk/channel connection as long as there
is energy detected in either direction of transmission.  This effectively
reduces the number of long-distance channels available for connection to
other trunks, so the average/maximum number of data calls present in a pool
of 240 random trunks was an important consideration in the engineering of
TASI-E.

In 1978-79, Long Lines planned to install TASI-E on many domestic routes
of longer than 1000 miles, but the plans were eventually dropped for a
variety of reasons.  I think the first big discussion of TASI was in a
1954 issue of the Bell System Technical Journal, if you're interested further.

	Ed Schulz, AT&T Information Systems Laboratories, Holmdel, N.J.
	(201) 834-3838     hou**!houca!solar!eds

preece@uicsl.UUCP (10/28/83)

#R:solar:-28100:uicsl:4100001:000:532
uicsl!preece    Oct 27 09:59:00 1983

It seems foolish to mention this, given that digital transmission is
not all that far off, but there's no reason they couldn't multiplex
the modem channels by providing simulated carriers at the output end
during periods when the carrier is unmodulated.  The switching would
have to pretty clean when a signal does appear, but I would think
they could do it, if there were enough modem traffic to make the
pinned channels a problem.

Personally, I'd rather have true digital transmission...

scott preece
ihnp4!uiucdcs!uicsl!preece