[net.dcom] 2400 bps Modems

hes@ecsvax.UUCP (03/08/84)

<> I received a brochure from Chung Telecommunications (4046 Ben Lomond
Dr., Palo Alto, CA 94036  (415)858-2456) about a box which squeezes
2400 bps through a 212A modem.  It will either multiplex two 1200 bps
devices or send one 2400 bps.  The price is $695 for a one-channel
version, and it also provides automatic error detection and retransmit.
(Remember, you need on at each end of the line.)  The modem required
is "Modem type: Bell-212A, with synchronous option.  Operating mode:
full-duplex on 2-wire dial-up line."
   The gadget is called a turboMUX(tm).
   Has anybody actually seen/touched/used this critter?
--henry schaffer  ncsu  genetics

daemon@decwrl.UUCP (03/08/84)

From: tonto::belasco  (Steven G. Belasco  UHO  DTN 264-4920)


I have been following the exchanges about modems with some interest since
I was once involved that facet of the industry for some time.  Perhaps this
may help to clear up some of the confusion which appears to exist on the 
subject at the present time.

There are currently three US manufacturers who are delivering wide ranging 
compatibility product in the 2400 bps, full-duplex (FDX) (transmit and receive 
simultaneously), 2-wire dial line market:
	Codex Corporation (subsidary of Motorola), Mansfield, MA
		Codex 224; Codex V.22bis
	Concord Data Systems, Waltham, MA
		CDS 224
	Racal-Vadic Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA
		Vadic Quad Modem (VA4400)
There are also several manufacturers (i.e. NEC America) who have announced 
similar products, but at present, I am unaware of any large quantity of them 
in the field at this time.

All of these units are 2400 bps, 2-wire, FDX operating over the public switched
(dial telephone) network, compatible with the soon to be announced AT&T "Bell
224" mode as well as the soon to be approved (at the Nov.'84 session in Geneva)
CCITT Recommendation V.22bis.  They also operate in fallback mode at 1200 bps
in a compatible mode with Bell 212A or CCITT V.22 equipment.  Under the terms 
of these "standards", the modems transmit a specific signal pattern which is in
fact 2400 bps at 600 baud.  In other words, every 1/600 of a second (one baud
time), four bits of data are transmitted.  At 1200 bps, only two bits are
transmitted each baud time.  Since both the CDS and Codex 224 units are 
compatible with the standards in V.22bis or V.22 mode, these modems can "talk"
over international dial circuits to other CCITT compatible modems supplied by
local national Postal Telephone Telegraph administrations (the equivalent to
AT&T, Bell, the FCC and the PUC all rolled into one) throughout the rest of the
world. 

Both the Concord and Codex units are mechanically designed so that you unplug
your telephone's RJ-11 plastic line cord plug from the wall socket, plug the 
modem into the wall, and then connect the telephone to the RJ-11 jack on the 
rear panel of the modem.  This makes it possible to place calls manually 
through the modem, or with the appropriate switch settings in the modem, 
answer the telephone as though the modem did not exist.  Although I haven't
seen them yet, I'm told both manufacturers either currently offer or have
announced and will soon deliver automatic dial versions of these products.

While price isn't everything when you should look at when you buy a unit like 
this, the last time I checked, Concord offered the lowest price at $995. 
Although the Codex units cost $1195 each, they can be ordered at discounted
rates through Codex's direct sales staff in many major cities around the 
country, or directly from their factory at full price with shipment in 72 
hours through their catalog sales department by calling 800-446-6336. 

The Vadic unit offers added capability (at around $1800+) in that their QUAD
modem will also run Bell 103 mode (300 bps, 2-wire, FDX) and Vadic's 
proprietary VA3400 mode (1200 bps, 2-wire, FDX) as well.  From bench tests I
saw run, all the units tested performed quite well in 224 and 212 mode with the
most noteworthy difference being that the Codex unit provided between 2 db and 
4 db better signal to noise ratio performance over the competing products under
similar degraded communications line conditions.