[net.dcom] 20 pounds in a 5-pound sack

mp@whuxle.UUCP (Mark Plotnick) (05/16/84)

There was discussion awhile ago in one of the net.news subgroups about
getting 2400-baud modems, but people said they were kind of expensive.
Well, in last week's Computerworld, there was an article about a
product from Chung Telecommunications Corp. in Palo Alto.  They have
a device called the Turbo-Max-2 that goes for $995.  It allegedly
"compacts and combines two full-duplex 2400 bit/sec asynch data
streams into a 1200 bit/sec modem."  Ms. Chung claims it is
"impervious to data content, protocol and line conditions."

Has anyone heard anything more about this, or seen it in action?

	Mark

dya@unc-c.UUCP (05/17/84)

References: whuxle.367


    It's not a product. It's not a product. It's not a product!

    I've been bugging these people for several months ( in fact, it is
time to bug them again ) because they supposedly can compact 19.2 kb/s
async into 9.6 kb/s async ( want to use with my 9600 A/B UDS modems ).
Yes, I know that Ms. Chung keeps claiming that the compression is 2:1
regardless of data content, but I don't believe it...yet.

    Another product, the Racal-Vadic Scotsman III, uses about 4 different
algorithms based on the statistical occurance of each ascii character
coming in (kinda like a dynamic Huffman code). It is totally worthless
unless you are sending plain English text. One of its modes actually encodes
frequently used words.

     When they have a product, I'll post to the net a full road test with
really scrambled data ( delta-modulated 256kb TV pictures. )

dya