[comp.os.vms] publishing patch

BOLTHOUSE%MCOPN1@eg.ti.COM.UUCP (06/09/87)

Re: the magical patch.  I have several systems which can't afford to
reboot often.  We were hoping to apply the patch at a reasonable time;
i.e., when the machines were down anyway, say, for standalone backups.
Now that it has been published, I know of several info-vax readers at
our site who are intelligent enough to deduce how to get around things.
This means I have to reboot these systems *before* they do.  Most of 
them won't bother, but one can't be sure...  Our manufacturing customers
will undoubtedly give you hearty thanks.

I will don my suit of armor for the time when, shortly after the required
reboot, they wish to skewer me...

david l. bolthouse
texas instruments defense electronics information systems VAX system support
mckinney, texas

no phone number this time...
internet:  bolthouse%mcopn1@ti-eg.com

VORBRUEG@DBNPIB5.BITNET (06/13/87)

* FLAME ON *
Now, do you read this list or not? I can remember it being stated at
least once that this patch does *NOT* require a reboot. And if you really
knew what you're doing, you would see immediately that telling INSTALL
to replace SECURESHR is all that is necessary to activate it.

On another tack, I just can't imagine a computer which is not available
for a reboot (i.e. at worst 15 minutes) at some scheduled time, let's say
3 o'clock on a nice Saturday morning. So please save us this destructive
moan about your users!

* FLAME OFF *

It's just that I prefer to know about the security holes (hole? Lake Baikal!)
and, even more important, of a way to fix them as soon as possible. And the
speed of DEC's software distribution being what it is ...:-)

--- Jan Vorbrueggen

carl@CITHEX.CALTECH.EDU.UUCP (06/14/87)

 > On another tack, I just can't imagine a computer which is not available for
 > a  reboot  (i.e.   at worst 15 minutes) at some scheduled time, let's say 3
 > o'clock on a nice Saturday morning.  So please  save  us  this  destructive
 > moan about your users!

Let me give your imagination some help.  Picture the following:
   A group of physicists spends years designing an experiment to be run on  an
   accelerator someplace (CERN, SLAC, FERMILAB, wherever).  They then wait for
   another extended period of time to get  the  experiment  scheduled  on  the
   accelerator.   They start the experiment, and have a VAX doing on-line data
   collection, with some  on-line  analysis  to  select  only  the  events  of
   interest.  You,  as  a system manager, then tell them that they're going to
   lose 15 minutes of data so that you can perform an elective reboot  of  the
   system.  I guarantee, they won't be pleased.
Yes, a system can always be rebooted, but not always at a reasonable cost.

tli@sargas.usc.edu.UUCP (06/14/87)

In article <8706131331.AA09106@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
VORBRUEG@DBNPIB5.BITNET writes: 
    * FLAME ON *
    On another tack, I just can't imagine a computer which is not available
    for a reboot (i.e. at worst 15 minutes) at some scheduled time, let's say
    3 o'clock on a nice Saturday morning. So please save us this destructive
    moan about your users!
    * FLAME OFF *

I suggest that you use more imagination.  There are *MANY* sites which
use their systems for large scale numerical processing and real time
control applications.  Any amount of downtime for these types of
systems can be very hard to come by.  Even academic systems near the
end of the semester have numerous users at all hours.
-- 
Tony Li - USC University Computing Services	"Fene mele kiki bobo"
Uucp: oberon!tli						-- Joe Isuzu
Bitnet: tli@uscvaxq, tli@ramoth
Internet: tli@sargas.usc.edu