davidl@tekadg.UUCP (Dave) (04/18/85)
I have lately been informed that somebody ELSE has been "deleted" from the
net - (made an "unkeyboard???") and it now occurs to me that some recognition
is due for this (I won't mention his name but his initials stand for
John Williams, dep't.) What I propose is that all of us radical scum
out here form our own little clique of Them What Has Been Censured (censored,
take your pick). If anyone has been following the growth of the neo-Nazi
movement up here in the Northwest, they may have taken not of the "point
system" employed thereby - i.e. to be designated an Aryan Warrior, one
has to accumulate one Point, with various fractions of a point being
awarded for various types of assassinations - like, talk-show moderators
only 1/10 of a point, congressmen 1/4 of a point, a FULL point for a
President (seems unbalanced, actually) - kind of like road targets in
highschool, right? Teacher worth 100 points? well... anyway... back
to the subject. What I am proposing is that we (radical scum) designate
a similar point system for admission into OUR little clique - like, ok.
N points (N to be determined by argument hereafter) each upon, for instance:
(multiple instances should add ?)
(1). Getting flamed at (worth less than nothing).
(2). Getting threatened (worth almost nothing).
(3). Getting threatened or whimpered at by certain, particular
whining little adolescent net dweeb(s) (the whinier, the more points)
(4). Having your manager, system adminstrator, or other wanker
contacted (worth something, at least)
(5). Being contacted by one of the above (worth a little more)
(6). Being THREATENED by one of the above (worth still MORE in
the case of manager, almost nothing in the case of system
administrator)
(7,8). Being [contacted,THREATENED][breathed on?] as per [5,6]
by above [3] dweeb(s). (whew!) (LOTS in the case of breathed
on with compunerd dorito breath)
(9). Being automatically deleted by name from a system (Worth
quite a bit; a compunerd had to write some REAL CODE - probably
without help from its MOMMY!)
(10). Being automatically deleted BY SITE from an entire
NEWSGROUP (is it even possible to do this)
(11). being KICKED OFF THE NET now I think this deserves the full
point, or 100 points, or whatever is required to be accorded
full membership in our elite group. (Kafka, are you listening?)
(12). being kicked off the net AND having your TERMINAL confiscated
(for this you become an OFFICER points be DAMNED)
(13). causing your SITE to get DISCONNECTED!!!!! GAAAAk goop.
Could any reward be sufficient?
The number, order, and importance of these is obviously open to debate,
but the contest starts now, and dammit Williams I'm NOT going to let
you get ahead of me!!!! Last one off the net is a COMPUNERD!!!!!!!!!
(Frank, call me up and we'll discuss your point status...)werner@ut-ngp.UUCP (Werner Uhrig) (04/18/85)
[ below follows the text of a message I sent to the davidl@tekadg - I hope his mailbox overflows with similar messages - please forgive this follow-up ] you showed ignorance and lack of consideration in the choice of news-groups you decided to post to. Behavior like this makes me wonder if I really should continue my stand of speaking up against banning/censoring anyone on this net. You did yourself and the net a disservice, I'm afraid.
erice@tekig.UUCP (Eric Etheridge) (04/20/85)
> I have lately been informed that somebody ELSE has been "deleted" from the > ... instances should add ?) > > (1). Getting flamed at (worth less than nothing). > > (2). Getting threatened (worth almost nothing). > > (3). Getting threatened or whimpered at by certain, particular > whining little adolescent net dweeb(s) (the whinier, the more points) > > ....... Would you lose points for getting agreed with by these individuals? (Would anyone in their right mind admit to being agreed with by these guys?)
goldman@umn-cs.UUCP (Matthew D. Goldman ) (04/24/85)
Well I've already had someone change their username to prevent me sending her mail (at least till I find out her new username) Matt Goldman aka Winston North inhp4!stolaf!umn-cs!goldman
jc@mit-athena.UUCP (John Chambers) (04/26/85)
Wow! I love it! I mean, I probably won't have a very high score; I don't even contribute to bogging down my system by playing Rogue [I'm too busy bogging it down running compiles]; but can I get in on the voting? Modifying a mail program to automagically drop anything with a source (id, site) on a given list strikes me as a rather easy job. I'd estimate a day with a program I've never seen; half a day with one I have seen [like sendmail]. I rather expect that such modifications have been made at some sites. It could lighten their load significantly. -- John Chambers [...!decvax!mit-athena] He who has made no mistakes has probably made nothing at all.