[comp.os.vms] As stated

west%etd1.DECnet@AFWAL-AAA.ARPA ("ETD1::WEST") (11/16/87)

From:	AVLAB::MAILER       14-NOV-1987 22:46
To:	ETD1::WEST
Subj:	DDN Mail Message

Return-Path: <@KL.SRI.COM:Mail_System%UCE.MFENET@NMFECC.ARPA>
Received: from KL.SRI.COM by afwal-aaa.arpa ; 14 Nov 87 21:45:33 EDT
Received: from NMFECC.ARPA by KL.SRI.COM with TCP; Sat 14 Nov 87 19:45:41-PST
Received: from uce.mfenet by ccc.mfenet with Tell via MfeNet ;
	Sat, 14 Nov 87 19:45:41 PST
Date:	12 Nov 87 14:46:00 EDT
From:     Mail_System%UCE.MFENET@NMFECC.ARPA
Message-Id: <871114194542.0ln@NMFECC.ARPA>
Subject: Returned/Rejected MFENET mail
To:       west%etd1.decnet%afwal-aaa.arpa@KL.SRI.COM
Comment: Failed Address was JOEL@UCE.MFENET

Start of returned message

From:   west%etd1.decnet%afwal-aaa.arpa@ccc.mfenet
Subject: LAT vs. any other kind of terminal connection
Date:   12 Nov 87 14:46:00 EDT
Received: from KL.SRI.COM by NMFECC.ARPA with INTERNET ;
          Sat, 14 Nov 87 19:44:35 PST
Received: from afwal-aaa.arpa by KL.SRI.COM with TCP; Thu 12 Nov 87 11:55:49-PST
To: "info-vax" <info-vax@kl.sri.com>
Reply-To: "ETD1::WEST" <west%etd1.decnet@afwal-aaa.arpa>


At the Air FDorce Avionics Lab, we have an Ethernet backbone with (at least)
12 VAX and lots of graphics workstations attached.  This backbone runs
DECnet, LAT, CALMAnet, TCP/IP and more.  This backbone serves AT LEAST 40 and
maybe more highly utilized terminal servers (DECserver 100 and 200's.)  This
is 320 terminals and PC's connected by LAT,  there are also several (10-15)
devices connected by reverse LAT on DS200's...FOM's etc.  

My point...the net is busy but not strained.  There is NO terminal I/O 
degredation...and this technique beats using DZ-11's hands down for off loading
processing.  A performance audit showed that 15% of the CPU was being spent
handling interrupts (from DZ-11's).  After getting rid of the DZ's and 
going to LAT,  the time spent in interrupt was .LT. 2%.  Over 10% of the VAX
cpu time was returned to the users for the price of an upgrade which is
justifiable in terms of convenience (for distributed connect capability) alone!

Mike West
Air Force Avionics Lab
AFWAL/AADE
WPAFB, OH 45433

west%etd1.decnet@afwal-aaa.arpa

------
------

west%etd1.DECnet@AFWAL-AAA.ARPA ("ETD1::WEST") (11/16/87)

From:	AVLAB::MAILER       15-NOV-1987 19:57
To:	ETD1::WEST
Subj:	DDN Mail Message

Return-Path: <POSTMASTER%CSBVAX.decnet@ge-crd.arpa>
Received: from GE-CRD.ARPA by afwal-aaa.arpa ; 15 Nov 87 18:55:34 EDT
Date: 15 Nov 87 19:56 EST
From: POSTMASTER%CSBVAX.decnet@ge-crd.arpa
Subject: Message Delivery Notification
To: west%etd1.decnet@afwal-aaa.arpa

Delivery of this message at CSBVAX had the following result[s]:
Failed to deliver to: DCOTTLER
%SYSTEM-F-UNREACHABLE, remote node is not currently reachable
------------------------------------------------------------
The  Original  Message  Follows
Received: from afwal-aaa.arpa by KL.SRI.COM with TCP; Sat 14 Nov 87 13:35:32-PST
Date: 14 Nov 87 16:18:00 EDT
From: "ETD1::WEST" <west%etd1.decnet@afwal-aaa.arpa>
Subject: DCL Compiler
To: "info-vax" <info-vax@kl.sri.com>
Reply-To: "ETD1::WEST" <west%etd1.decnet@afwal-aaa.arpa>

Dear INFO-VAX:

Is anyone out there using a DCL compiler?  I would appreciate hearing a few
comments.


Mike West, DP Manager 
Air Force Avionics Lab
AFWAL/AADE
WPAFB, OH 45433

west%etd1.decnet@afwal-aaa.arpa
------

------