[net.dcom] Codex 2660 series modems

phil@amdcad.UUCP (Phil Ngai) (04/29/85)

Has anyone seen the new Codex 2660 series trellis coded modems?
I opened one up and am just amazed at what's inside. For example,
the least exotic piece of LSI is a MC68000. I never expected to have
a modem smarter than many computers I have used. The sucker is expensive
($13K) but our calculations show that a 16Kb modem will pay for itself
pretty quickly in many of our applications. Assuming it works.

Down the hall the chip planners are mumbling something about ISDN
making all this analog stuff obsolete. We'll see.

-- 
 I speak for myself and no one else.

 Phil Ngai (408) 749-5720
 UUCP: {ucbvax,decwrl,ihnp4,allegra}!amdcad!phil
 ARPA: amdcad!phil@decwrl.ARPA

hes@ecsvax.UUCP (Henry Schaffer) (04/30/85)

First the disk controller chips got smarter (more complex) than
the microprocessor CPU, now Phil points out that the modem is
smarter than the CPU.  Is this just the start of a natural
progression towards ....?
--henry schaffer

dsi@unccvax.UUCP (Dataspan Inc) (05/01/85)

    Pardon my ignorance, but just what is a trellis coded modem? UDS also
supposedly has one which also supports V.29, and is a mere $3900 in onsies;
top speed is said to be 14400 b/s. 

    This would seem to pay back way faster than the Codex 2660 although 
comments on both of them would be appreciated. 

David Anthony 
Sr. Video Nut.
DataSpan, Inc.

phil@amdcad.UUCP (Phil Ngai) (05/03/85)

In article <191@unccvax.UUCP>, dsi@unccvax.UUCP (Dataspan Inc) writes:
> 
>     Pardon my ignorance, but just what is a trellis coded modem? UDS also
> supposedly has one which also supports V.29, and is a mere $3900 in onsies;
> top speed is said to be 14400 b/s. 

From the Codex literature:

Trellis Coded Modulation (TCM): This modulation mode is employed by the Codex
2660 for data rates from 9.6 to 16.8 Kbps over D1 leased lines. The 8-state
coded modulation scheme uses twice the required number of signal points
(256 points at 16.8, 128 at 14.4, 64 at 12, and 32 points at 9.6 Kbps) to
transmit redundant data for superior performance compared to first generation
high speed modems.

It's a form of ECC for modems, you could say.

By the way, you have to logon with a password before you can use the front
panel on the 2660.

>     This would seem to pay back way faster than the Codex 2660 although 
> comments on both of them would be appreciated. 

That's possible. A phone line to the Far East is awfully expensive, though.
Codex also has a network control system for monitoring line conditions which
we seem to like.

-- 
 I speak for myself and no one else.

 Phil Ngai (408) 749-5720
 UUCP: {ucbvax,decwrl,ihnp4,allegra}!amdcad!phil
 ARPA: amdcad!phil@decwrl.ARPA

wunder@wdl1.UUCP (05/07/85)

If 16Kbits is still too slow, how about 19.2K?  NEC has announced
the 19200M modem for four-wire D1 conditioned leased lines (these
are the same kind of line that we run 9600 bit/sec V.29 modems
over).  Only $12,000, cheap.  It has backup speeds of 16.8K, 12K,
and 9600, and includes an eight port mux.

Me, I'm waiting for the V.32 modems -- 9600 over a dial-up line.

wunder

jbn@wdl1.UUCP (05/11/85)

      The increasing intelligence of peripherals is certainly reaching
amazing levels.  Take a look at any of the intelligent Ethernet controllers.
CMC's is especially impressive; M68000, 128KB RAM, ROM, LANCE chip, etc.
all on one VMEbus card.  They had to use 1Mb single inline RAM packages to
make it all fit, but they did it.  Excelan's is equally crammed, although
Intel 186 based.
      Then there's DEC, which seems to have a corporate policy of not using
microprocessors in peripherals, except maybe a J11 now and then or that
strange mid-70s vintage microengine in the DMC/DMR/KMC board family.

					John Nagle

brad@kontron.UUCP (Brad Yearwood) (05/14/85)

> If 16Kbits is still too slow, how about 19.2K?  NEC has announced
> the 19200M modem ...

Does anyone know:
  1.  How to obtain a copy of the V.32 standard mentioned later
      in the subject article for 9600 bit/sec dialup?
  2.  Any other good papers (hopefully readable without too much
      mathemagic) on trellis coding and other techniques used in
      these incredible-by-212-standards modems?  I'm starting with
      Gottfried Ungerboeck's "Channel Coding with Multilevel/Phase
      Signals" in IEEE Trans. Info. Theory, IT-28 #1, January 1982.
      This is rough going for me, so pointers to more directly
      relevant, diluted, tutorial type articles would be much
      appreciated.

I'm fascinated by the possibility of squeezing a useful bandwidth
from my crummy home phone to a computer or network.

Brad Yearwood
Kontron Electronics
(714) 660-0270

  {ucbvax!unisoft | scgvaxd | trwrb}!pertec!kontron!brad

greszcz@utcsri.UUCP (John Greszczuk) (05/16/85)

> Does anyone know:
>   2.  Any other good papers (hopefully readable without too much
>       mathemagic) on trellis coding and other techniques used in
>       these incredible-by-212-standards modems?  I'm starting with
>       Gottfried Ungerboeck's "Channel Coding with Multilevel/Phase
>       Signals" in IEEE Trans. Info. Theory, IT-28 #1, January 1982.
>       This is rough going for me, so pointers to more directly
>       relevant, diluted, tutorial type articles would be much
>       appreciated.
______________________________________________________________________

     A good comprehensive tutorial article is :

" Efficient Modulation for Bandlimited Channels "
in the IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications , September 1984.

It is written by Forney, Quershi, Lang and some others who are 
associated with Motorola Information Systems ( CODEX , ESE ).

There are other more specific articles that might be of interest in
that special issue on voiceband data communications.

John Greszczuk
Dept. of Elec. Eng.
University of Toronto