rhealey@umn-d-ub.D.UMN.EDU (Rob Healey) (11/10/89)
In some previous article I sez: >> gcc already works like a charm on the UNIX PC and needs no work >> to get it going, this is as of the 1.36 version which I got >> via anonymous ftp from somewhere. As I said above, gdb 3.33 works In some previous article Sparkie sez: >What does one have to have to get gdb compiled. I've not tried, but have >been told that you've got to get: bison(don't have), gas(don't have), >gcc(hey, I've got that 1.36), and gld (don't have). What about to get >g++ compiled? My first goal is gdb, because I need a good debugger and >sdb SUCKS!! (sorry for getting a bit out of hand) Anyway, anyone with >some experience with this please let me know. I'm itching for a good >debugger. Will the fact that I have gcc make things easier? > OOOOOOOOOOPS, I forgot to mention one MIIIIIINOR little detail, the COFF gdb compiled on an Encore Multimax and NOT the UNIX PC. Actually, the current gdb3.3 and the Multimax have a difference of opinion about which symbols be which but that's another unpleasant story... Sorry about the mix up, -Rob