nitin@ur-laser.uucp (Nitin Sampat) (06/20/85)
Subject: Access to UUCP from bitnet ? Newsgroups: news.mail Can someone tell me if I can get thru to UUCP from Bitnet ? I am at node rochester!ur-laser!nitin and I can send mail from here to a Bitnet node via Gateway PSUVAX1. Howver, when I try to send mail from the Bitnet node ( running VMS ) , the computer does not like the format rochester!PSUVAX1!ur-laser ...etc (i.e. it does not like the exclamation marks etc..) I know the gateway is PSUVAX1 and that what worked one way should work the other way too. I just can't seem to "guess" the right syntax !! Can anyone help me, please ??? Also, for people familier with both VMS and Unix.. Do you know what Unix does to the control characters that VMS puts in a file. e.g. I have a .mem file generated using Runoff. How can I read this under Unix ???? Any help appreciated !!!............................nitin Subject: Subject: Access to UUCP from bitnet ? Newsgroups: Newsgroups: news.mail Subject: Image processing group ? Newsgroups: net.news.group, net.graphics Subject: Image processing group ? Newsgroups: net.news.groups Is anybody out there interested in starting an image processing group ? ...nitin
ken@turtlevax.UUCP (Ken Turkowski) (07/04/85)
>In article <6700016@datacube.UUCP> berger@datacube.UUCP writes: >>I would be interested in an Image Processing group. Is there enough interest? In article <395@ttidcb.UUCP> guzman@ttidcb.UUCP (Marc Guzman) writes: > 1 YES vote > Specific interests at this time : > 1) gray scale images > 2) compression of gray scale images > 3) filtering any other techniques for removing noise Make it another vote for image processing. I am interested in: 1) Compression of binary, gray scale, and color images 2) Feature extraction 3) Image transformations Note that I have cross-referenced this article to net.ai and net.news.group, with all followups going to net.news.group where discussion of new newsgroup creations belong. I suspect that we could carry on image processing discussions in net.graphics until the traffic warrants a new newsgroup. -- Ken Turkowski @ CADLINC, Menlo Park, CA UUCP: {amd,decwrl,hplabs,nsc,seismo,spar}!turtlevax!ken ARPA: turtlevax!ken@DECWRL.ARPA
ronse@prlb2.UUCP (Ronse) (07/04/85)
I'm in favour of the creation of an image processing newsgroup.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
maldoror@prlb2.UUCP
{enea,hirst1,inria,mcvax,munnari,philabs,seismo,unido}!prlb2!maldororhenry@utzoo.UUCP (Henry Spencer) (07/07/85)
> I'm in favour of the creation of an image processing newsgroup.
So start posting articles about image processing! Those of us who aren't
interested in it will let you know when the volume becomes annoying enough
to justify a separate group. Newsgroups unfortunately have a noticeable
per-group overhead within the news software, and should be created only if
there is reason to expect significant traffic. All too many groups have
been created by a bunch of enthusiastic people who would like to *read*
about a particular topic, only to find that nobody ever *writes* about it
after the first flurry of interest dies down.
--
Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology
{allegra,ihnp4,linus,decvax}!utzoo!henrynitin@ur-laser.uucp (Nitin Sampat) (07/08/85)
I posted a sign in net.graphics regarding an Image procesing group. To date, I have received about 7 YES votes. There are some more YES votes posted in this group. If anyone else is interested plese post your vote so we can initiate the group. Anybody objecting to this ? nitin
hes@ecsvax.UUCP (Henry Schaffer) (07/09/85)
I vote for keeping image processing in the existing net.graphics until the volume gets so large as to require its own group. --henry schaffer n c state univ
jrm@wdl1.UUCP (07/13/85)
I would be interested in seeing an image processing group established. jrm@ford-wdl1