[comp.windows.x] why SunWindows is Better than X

MANSFIEL@EMBL.BITNET (Niall Mansfield) (05/31/87)

Summary:
        We have to choose between SunWindows and X for
        future development.  I'm leaning towards X, but need
        more detailed and informed comment, so I can make a
        stronger case.

Verbose Form:
        We've just got a few Suns, and are starting to do
        real work on them.  Undoubtedly, we will need to
        choose a window system, and stick with it for a long
        time.  I'm sure that someone will argue we should
        use the Sun system because it must be better: after
        all, it cost money, whereas X is free.  My own view
        is that we should go for X because:

        1. Free Software is a good thing in itself.
        2. Free software is often good software, because its
        high exposure causes most of the bugs to be found
        quicker, and lots of razor sharp minds (like yours)
        are constantly working on it.
        3. It's networkable.
        4. It's not dependent on one manufacturer who has
        more or less got you captive.

        In the next couple of weeks, a decision will have to
        be made here, and I'd be very grateful if anybody
        could give me info or comments on the issues,
        whether for or against X.

        Does the advent of NeWS change the perspective, as
        (3) above applies to it, and if Sun licence it, then
        (4) will too?

Thanks,

Niall

john@hpljju.mit.EDU (John Uebbing) (06/01/87)

 
q