[net.news] Everyone's proposing moderating the wrong end?

gnu (12/23/82)

In his book Literary Machines, Ted Nelson proposed that in the Xanadu
system, there will also be much too much info to absorb, as in Usenet.  His
solution is the free-enterprise one (as usual) -- anyone can make indices
and put them in the database.  So, like magazine subscribing, you'd tend to
read and follow whoever's published indexes tended to match your interest
profile the best.

A way to do that in netnews, local to a site, is to say "If Soandso
liked/disliked this article, show me/can it."  Each person could have their
y's and n's recorded in a file in their home directory, if they chose.  A
readnews-like program could combine these files as a custom filter on what
it showed you.  For example, my .newsrc could say "Only show unix-wizards
articles to me if either Shannon or Pugs was interested".  Arbitrarily
complex or bizzarre combinations could be used, with selection based on
Person and/or OtherPerson and/or NewsgroupTemplate and/or TitleStringSearch
and/or TextSearch and/or...  You could specify what to do if your judging
person(s) haven't read the message yet -- show it unjudged, or keep it til
later.  And note that more subtle responses than 'y' and 'n' could be kept
(and amended after seeing the text, of course).

People whose interests fit many others' interests could distribute their
judgements to other sites where people were interested.

There are obvious rough edges too long to deal with here, but even this is a
better filter than none, and it retains the totally anarchistic philosophy.
Here's to filtering on the READING end!

	John Gilmore, Sun Microsystems

PS: Actually, just the capability to say "For the next 3 weeks, don't show
me any message with 'mac' or 'whopper' in the title" would be a big
improvement.