van@HYDRA.UNM.EDU (Van Rauch) (05/19/89)
Mailer problems somewhere. Did you recieve this? From MAILER-DAEMON%mtxinu.com@ariel.unm.edu Thu May 18 12:14:45 1989 Received: by ariel.unm.edu (5.54/1.0) id <AA02322>; Thu, 18 May 89 12:15:21 MDT Received: by ariel.unm.edu (5.54/1.0) id <AA02307>; Thu, 18 May 89 12:15:05 MDT Received: from ariel.unm.edu by mtxinu.COM (5.61/1.29-mls890331) id AA22358; Thu, 18 May 89 11:13:22 -0700 Date: Thu, 18 May 89 11:13:22 -0700 From: MAILER-DAEMON%mtxinu.com@ariel.unm.edu (Mail Delivery Subsystem) Subject: Returned mail: Host unknown Message-Id: <8905181813.AA22358@mtxinu.COM> To: <MAILER-DAEMON%charon.unm.edu@ariel.unm.edu> ----- Transcript of session follows ----- 550 <jason%kadmon@mtxinu.com>... Host unknown ----- Unsent message follows ----- Received: from ariel.unm.edu by mtxinu.COM (5.61/1.29-mls890331) id AA22354; Thu, 18 May 89 11:13:22 -0700 Received: by ariel.unm.edu (5.54/1.0) id <AA02260>; Thu, 18 May 89 12:14:35 MDT From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON%charon.unm.edu@ariel.unm.edu> Date: Thu, 18 May 89 12:14:32 MDT Message-Id: <22174.8905181814@charon.unm.edu> Subject: Returned mail: Deferred To: <jason%kadmon@mtxinu.com> ----- Transcript of session follows ----- 554 mailer mail died with signal 31 ----- Unsent message follows ----- Received: from EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU by unmvax.cs.unm.edu (5.61/3.1) with SMTP id <AA07625@unmvax.cs.unm.edu>; Thu, 18 May 89 11:10:11 -0600 Received: from ATHENA (ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by expo.lcs.mit.edu; Thu, 18 May 89 13:09:20 EDT Received: by ATHENA.MIT.EDU (5.45/4.7) id AA20984; Thu, 18 May 89 13:09:32 EDT Received: from kadmon.UUCP by mtxinu.COM (5.61/1.29-mls890331) id AA21323; Thu, 18 May 89 10:07:36 -0700 From: jason%kadmon@mtxinu.com (Jason Venner) Received: from localhost by kadmon.UUCP (3.2/25-eef) id AA00203; Thu, 18 May 89 09:44:06 PDT To: xpert@athena.mit.edu Subject: Re: X protocol question (I solved my problem). Date: Thu, 18 May 89 09:44:05 -0700 Message-Id: <202.611513045@kadmon> It turned out that for some reason I was not getting SIGIO's on the sockets, and I was using that to determine whether to read off of the X socket. The fact that this would cause the X server to crash is another problem... [Senario was: program listening at 6001 and X1 and with a io channel to another machine with a real X server at X0/6000 on other machine, program listening on the io channel, and when it recieves a new connection connecting to Real X and X0 I had done the usual for SIGIO's (fcntl setown, flags = FASYNC, handler for SIGIO's....) but the process which open'd the socket to the Real X server never got one, and then the X server would die often a few minutes after I had killed all of the processes.] So, I changed the code not to need SIGIO's Jason Jason Venner Jason@spar.stanford.edu jason@mtxinu.com jason@violet.berkeley.edu jason@ucbviolet.bitnet {...,ucbvax}!mtxinu!jason