peter@baylor.UUCP (Peter da Silva) (08/19/85)
Since people want both of these groups, why not combine them? net.sources,
as is, supports a lot of project-related traffic (here's the update to my last
mod of dave's last fix to joe's fix to the new version of the old faithful
foobar filter... who wants to take it from here?).
Net.sources.foo... followup-to: net.projects.foo.
This is the only rational reason I can see for a new sources subgroup, since
as it is net.sources doesn't get so many articles you can't just 'n' past
ones for machines you don't have...
Lauren: I don't agree that net.projects would cause any serious problem.
Yes, we just added net.bizarre to the groups we don't get. Yes, there is
a lot of trash on the network.
I don't think this would be trash.
I don't know what software there is out there to help my current projects.
I don't know who the software I have can help. Who else is working on the
same things that I am? The current set-up doesn't encourage the spread of
this sort of info...
And it would certainly be more useful than net.libertaria and net.free-will.
--
Peter (Made in Australia) da Silva
UUCP: ...!shell!neuro1!{hyd-ptd,baylor,datafac}!peter
MCI: PDASILVA; CIS: 70216,1076