[comp.windows.x] Names

brianw%gazooch@Sun.COM (Brian Warkentine) (08/23/89)

In article <8908221949.AA00329@expire.lcs.mit.edu> rws@EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU writes:
>
>    What was the rationale or precedent for these names?
>
>Geez, after all, it *is* called "X".

	I thought "X" was named after the predecessor "W" which runs under
	"V".    :-)    

--
Brian Warkentine
brianw%Eng@Sun.COM
(415) 336 4670