shep@allspice.lcs.mit.edu (Tim Shepard) (09/08/89)
I sent this to xpert a while back and I haven't seen it appear on comp.windows.x so I am now posting it. Sorry if you see it twice. Date: Sat, 2 Sep 89 18:14:04 EDT From: Tim Shepard <shep@PTT.LCS.MIT.EDU> To: xpert@expo.lcs.mit.edu Subject: Xqdss patches available If you are a frustrated user of the MIT R3 Xqdss server, then you might be interested in picking up the patches I just placed in contrib/Xqdss.patch1.Z on EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU. There is more information at the beginning of that file. -Tim Shepard <shep@ptt.lcs.mit.edu> (I am not part of the X Consortium.)
bothner@decwrl.dec.com (Per Bothner) (09/08/89)
In article <SHEP.89Sep7132756@allspice.lcs.mit.edu> shep@allspice.lcs.mit.edu (Tim Shepard) writes: >If you are a frustrated user of the MIT R3 Xqdss server, then you >might be interested in picking up the patches I just placed in >contrib/Xqdss.patch1.Z on EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU. If you can wait until R4, it will contain a vastly improved Xqdss server, based on the MIT R3 server, but brought up to product quality. (This is essentially the UWS 2.2 server.) -- --Per Bothner Western Software Lab, Digital Equipment, 181 Lytton Ave, Palo Alto CA 94301 bothner@wsl.dec.com ...!decwrl!bothner
davidh@dent.Berkeley.EDU (David S. Harrison) (09/08/89)
The new server Mr. Bothner speaks of is indeed much improved (I have been recently testing it). It also fixes the "Sequence Lost" problem with GNU emacs mentioned here recently. It sounds like X11R4 is going to be a winner. David Harrison UC Berkeley Electronics Research Lab (davidh@ic.Berkeley.EDU, ...!ucbvax!ucbcad!davidh)