[comp.windows.x] X over the phone?

gors@well.UUCP (Gordon Stewart) (09/27/89)

We are interested in running X applications over a fast modem 
connected to an X terminal.  Does anyone out there have any 
experience doing this?  What special software (if any) would we need?
How fast a modem do we need in order to get acceptable (to a patient
listener) response time?  

Thanks for your help.

			Karin Meyer
-- 
				{apple, pacbell, hplabs, ucbvax}!well!gors
							gors@well.sf.ca.us
(Doolan) | (Meyer) 

zs04+@andrew.cmu.edu (Zachary T. Smith) (09/28/89)

Don't bother. It says in the server-porting documentation that X needs
about 5 kilobytes per second data rate to work. In the same paragraph
they mention that a 9600 baud connection (hinting at a phone line hookup)
would be unacceptably slow.

Zach T. Smith (zs04+@andrew.cmu.edu)

montnaro@sprite.crd.ge.com (Skip Montanaro) (09/28/89)

In article <kZ8WsPe00W0MA_Xlpm@andrew.cmu.edu> zs04+@andrew.cmu.edu (Zachary T. Smith) writes:

   Don't bother. It says in the server-porting documentation that X needs
   about 5 kilobytes per second data rate to work. In the same paragraph
   they mention that a 9600 baud connection (hinting at a phone line hookup)
   would be unacceptably slow.

For those who aren't content with what others say can't be done, take a look
at GraphOn's X terminal. You run it through a Sun, which is where the X
server actually resides. A different protocol is used to communicate over
the serial line to the terminal.

I borrowed an evaluation unit we have and hooked it up at home through a
Trailblazer Plus. With a bit of diddling of ~/.awmrc to avoid extra bitmap
transfers, it appeared to work okay. Granted, I wouldn't want to use it day
in, day out, but for largely text-oriented work it's fine.

One use that has been suggested is to take on the road when you're in demo
mode.  Another possible use is for a developer who's confined to home for an
extended period of time due to illness. It's not a workstation, but it might
be a good substitute in some situations.

--
Skip Montanaro (montanaro@crdgw1.ge.com)

troyb@hpdml93.HP.COM (Troy Bergstrand) (09/29/89)

Mark Opperman from Sun Microsystems presented a paper at the Summer '89
Usenix conference which covered a X11 over serial line scheme with adequate
performance for transfer rates as low as 2400 baud.

The paper is entitled "At Home With X11/NeWS Windows" and can be found
in the conference proceedings.

harden@ics.COM (10/03/89)

Check out the GraphOn X terminals.  They are quite different from
the traditional X terminals in that the server executes on the host,
not on the terminal.  They then use a private protocol to communicate
with the host.  This is acceptable at 9600 baud.  

I don't actually have a terminal, but I saw one at Xhibition '89.

Their address is 

	GraphOn Terminal Corp.
	1980 Concourse Dr.
	San Jose, CA  95131

-Aub Harden
 harden@ics.com

***********************************************************************
*                                                                     *
*  Integrated Computer Solutions, Inc.  |  Everything you wanted to   *
*  163 Harvard Street                   |    know about X but were    *
*  Cambridge, MA  02139                 |       afraid to ask...      *
*                                                                     *
*  voice: 617/547-0510    fax: 617/547-0758    e-mail: info@ics.com   *
***********************************************************************