sdo@u1100a.UUCP (Scott Orshan) (06/15/84)
I've seen five articles in the past few days which were actually
posted to net.junk along with their other groups. The subject
seems to be the functioning of the brain.
The articles are:
<186@isrnix.UUCP>
<9@cbosgd.UUCP>
<189@isrnix.UUCP>
<3588@fortune.UUCP>
<20@cbosgd.UUCP>
I suppose net.junk is better than net.general, but you're not
supposed to post to it. Anyway, who would read an article whose
author thought that it belonged in net.junk?
--
Scott Orshan
Bell Communications Research
201-981-3064
{ihnp4,allegra,pyuxww}!u1100a!sdopaulsc@tekecs.UUCP (Paul Scherf) (06/23/84)
Re: who would read an article posted to net.junk? You did.