[comp.windows.x] Xt doc

converse@EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU (Donna Converse) (02/14/90)

> The trouble is that R3 and R4 Intrinsics document
> does not distinguish between functionality designed for the
> application programmer, and functionality designed for a widget
> writer.

Read the "About this Manual" page.

carlson@lance.tis.llnl.gov (John Carlson) (02/14/90)

In article <9002140105.AA04405@expo.lcs.mit.edu> converse@EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU (Donna Converse) writes:
>
>> The trouble is that R3 and R4 Intrinsics document
>> does not distinguish between functionality designed for the
>> application programmer, and functionality designed for a widget
>> writer.
>
>Read the "About this Manual" page.

Since I haven't printed the Xt R4 doc, I recommend looking in the Xaw index
for the list of acceptable Xt calls for application writers.  Is this ok?


John

converse@EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU (Donna Converse) (02/15/90)

> In article <9002140105.AA04405@expo.lcs.mit.edu> converse@EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU (Donna Converse) writes:
> >
> >> The trouble is that R3 and R4 Intrinsics document
> >> does not distinguish between functionality designed for the
> >> application programmer, and functionality designed for a widget
> >> writer.
> >
> >Read the "About this Manual" page.
> 
> Since I haven't printed the Xt R4 doc, I recommend looking in the Xaw index
> for the list of acceptable Xt calls for application writers.  Is this ok?

No, it is not ok.