andrewn@syma.sussex.ac.uk (Andrew D Nimmo) (03/11/90)
XV11R4 fix 4 removes the following line from apollo.cf -- #define HasNdbm YES (despite the existance of the ndbm routines). This results in errors - e.g. building the rgb executables. (I am currently building a `fixed' server, using SR10.1.p on a DN10000VS then I will rebuild the motorola based servers). Was this an intentional modification, and was it tested prior to release? Andrew D. Nimmo (system admin) -- Andrew D. Nimmo, VLSI & Graphics Research Group, | JANET: andrewn@uk.ac.sussex.syma EAPS II, University of Sussex, Falmer, | INTERNET: andrewn%uk.ac.sussex.syma@nsfnet-relay.ac.uk BRIGHTON, East Sussex, BN1 9QT | BITNET: andrewn%uk.ac.sussex.syma@uk.ac TEL: +44 273 606755 x 2617 | UUCP: ...mcsun!ukc!syma!andrewn or andrewn@syma.uucp
rws@EXPO.LCS.MIT.EDU (Bob Scheifler) (03/12/90)
XV11R4 fix 4 removes the following line from apollo.cf -- #define HasNdbm YES This results in errors - e.g. building the rgb executables. Was this an intentional modification, and was it tested prior to release? The changes were received from Apollo, and passed on without much verification. It looks like we didn't do a full rebuild of everything here beforehand, since rgb also fails to build on our DN4500 under SR10.2. I suggest you put the line back in.