[comp.windows.x] what's most important to you for R5

rlk@THINK.COM (Robert L Krawitz) (06/27/90)

   Date: 26 Jun 90 16:00:56 GMT
   From: cunixf.cc.columbia.edu!reha@rutgers.edu  (Reha Elci)

   Since X already has the client/server approach, one client program
   can already open any display. What is missing is multiple displays +
   event mirroring. I guess there would be an artificial way of doing
   this if I replace XtAppMainLoop to send the same events to multiple
   displays. This would be quite useful in training sessions where
   proximity to other sites preclude possibility of demonstration using
   single client & server. It also makes support much easier when, say,
   a remote user is trying to demonstrate a bug in result of a sequence
   of events.

Along similar lines, broader support for multi-display and transferring
of applications between displays, along with error recovery
(XReopenDisplay?).  Saber C already does this, and it's very handy.
While this is admittedly likely to be application specific, having hooks
at the Xt level (for example) would strongly encourage people to take
advantage of this facility.  Somewhat to my surprise (the thing was a
real hack), the old X10 x-change-display function in GNU Emacs is
something that several people around here seem to want.  That function
never really addressed the resource (in those days, the X default)
issue, but perhaps it would be possible to work out where such a client
would get its resources from.

ames >>>>>>>>>  |	Robert Krawitz <rlk@think.com>	245 First St.
bloom-beacon >  |think!rlk	(assistant postmaster)	Cambridge, MA  02142
harvard >>>>>>  .	Thinking Machines Corp.		(617)876-1111