[comp.windows.x] STOP

zinnato@NADC.NADC.NAVY.MIL (R. Zinnato) (07/04/90)

can we please STOP with the stupid OpenLook vs. Motif debates?  I'm really
getting tired of hearing everyone's *personal* opinion.  I don't give
a good goddam *what* you think.  I've made up my mind.  I'm sure everyone
in this discussion has made up their mind, or at least has an idea, and I
don't think *your* 2 cents worth will really change their mind.  I have
enough stuff to wade through each day without having to hear why *you*
feel OpenLook is superior to Motif or vica-versa.  Give it a rest.

jim@ocsmd.ocs.COM (Jim Muth) (07/04/90)

> can we please STOP with the stupid OpenLook vs. Motif debates?  I'm really
> getting tired of hearing everyone's *personal* opinion.

I agree!  Sort of.

The OpenLook vs. Motif debate is degenerating into a religious war.  What
would REALLY be helpful (IMHO) is some lively debate on how to use OpenLook,
or Motif, or whatever, to write a good user-interface.  A consistent
look-and-feel or a nifty toolkit doesn't guarantee that a user-interface will
be easy to use.  And that's the whole point, isn't it?

______

Jim Muth (jim@ocs.com)
Online Computer Systems, Inc.

kestrel.raveling@unify.UUCP (Paul Raveling) (07/05/90)

> 
> The OpenLook vs. Motif debate is degenerating into a religious war.  What
> would REALLY be helpful (IMHO) is some lively debate on how to use OpenLook,
> or Motif, or whatever, to write a good user-interface.  A consistent
> look-and-feel or a nifty toolkit doesn't guarantee that a user-interface will
> be easy to use.  And that's the whole point, isn't it?

	Not entirely.  One of my greatest concerns is that when
	we develop standards we often nail ourselves to the trailing
	edge of technology, and we pay for it forever.  User interfaces
	are the #2 spot I'd name where the quality of the tool
	has the most leverage on its users' productivity -- we have
	potentially lots to gain and risk having lots to lose.

	#1 on the leverage list is operating systems, where we're
	pretty well stuck with 1970 technology.  Some of us have
	been looking back for years and saying "we could have and
	should have done that better -- it's costing us plenty in
	software engineering time".

	The same is already true to some extent for X, but the X11
	standard will probably also be with us forever.  At least
	with OpenLook and Motif a choice is available between two
	competitors; we'd do well to choose wisely.


------------------
Paul Raveling
Raveling@unify.com

datri@convex.com (Anthony A. Datri) (07/09/90)

>	with OpenLook and Motif a choice is available between two
>	competitors; we'd do well to choose wisely.

Why do we have to choose at all?  I ignore both of them.



--