[comp.windows.x] what's most important to you for R5? -- error messages

lee@sq.sq.com (Liam R. E. Quin) (07/12/90)

[note slightly changed subject line]

jpc@fctunl.rccn.pt (Jose Pina Coelho) writes
>Error messages (I mean with a few more bits of information)
and goes on to give a very good (IHMO...) case for more precise error
messages.

On the other hand, the messages are already verbose and a little on
the cryptic side for non-technical users.

Perhas the error-message-level should be configurable?  Or should there
be provision for an error daemon, like syslogd, that can try to pop up
a little window with a picture of a bomb and a red border?

Lee
-- 
Liam R. E. Quin,  lee@sq.com, {utai,utzoo}!sq!lee,  SoftQuad Inc., Toronto
``Sun. n.s.,  Any thing eminently splendid'' [Johnson's dictionary (1837)]

jpc@fctunl.rccn.pt (Jose Pina Coelho) (07/13/90)

In article <1990Jul11.184523.28676@sq.sq.com> lee@sq.sq.com (Liam R. E. Quin) writes:
>
>   On the other hand, the messages are already verbose and a little on
>   the cryptic side for non-technical users.
>
>   Perhas the error-message-level should be configurable?  Or should there
>   be provision for an error daemon, like syslogd, that can try to pop up
>   a little window with a picture of a bomb and a red border?


Guess so, we could have a variable in Xlib to give the message level.

#define XEL_Low		 1	/* Low level: X invalid request, for
				   non-techincal users */
#define XEL_Medium	 2	/* Medium level: Like X11R4	*/
#define XEL_Hight	 3	/* High level: what parameter,
				   full arguments etc... */
#define XEL_Philosofical 4	/* Try to analyze the arguments>
					Arg 1 is a 320x200x8 pixmap, etc ...

extern int XErrorLevel;		/* defaults to XEL_Medium	*/



PS: As usual I speak for myself, my cat prefers FORTRAN and a card
puncher.

--
Jose Pina Coelho        | BITNET/Internet: jpc@fctunl.rccn.pt
Rua Jau N 1, 2 Dto      | UUCP: jpc@unl.uucp
1300 Lisboa, PORTUGAL   | ARPA: jpc%hara.fctunl.rccn.pt@mitvma.mit.edu
Home phone: (+351) (1) 640767

- If all men were brothers, would you let one marry your sister ?