hvr@eng.sun.COM (Heather Rose) (08/13/90)
Are coming this week. We'll send out an anouncement when the sources are on expo. Regards, Heather
doug@genmri.UUCP (Doug Becker) (08/14/90)
Are coming this week. We'll send out an anouncement when the
sources are on expo.
Will there be any difference whatsoever between the sources that will
appear on expo and the sources that were used to compile the libraries
that are being shipped with OpenWindows 2.0?
--
Douglas H. Becker
doug@nmri.GE.COM
{somewhere}!crdgw1.GE.COM!sane!doughvr@kimba.Eng.Sun.COM (Heather Rose) (08/17/90)
In article <9008131911.AA24886@genmri.sane.COM> doug@genmri.UUCP (Doug Becker) writes: > >Will there be any difference whatsoever between the sources that will >appear on expo and the sources that were used to compile the libraries >that are being shipped with OpenWindows 2.0? The version of XView 2.0 on expo is completely interchangeable with the OpenWindows V2 (OWV2) binaries. Measures have been taken to compile in the same way for MIT code as Sun does for the binary distribution. Now is it one to one with OWV2? yes for the sun386i version, no for the sun3 and sun4 versions. There were a few bugfixes made which showed up on the sun386i which did not show up on the sun3 and sun4 obviously. Note: OWV2 has not yet been distributed for the sun386i. Also, one can change the code by compiling different ways... -- ____________________________________________________ Heather Rose, Sun Microsystems Inc., hvr@Eng.Sun.COM