[comp.windows.x] Modified xlock available?

bklaas@gila.intel.com (Brian Klaas~) (09/20/90)

Has anyone modified xlock to include different lockscreens (other then
qix and hopalong)?  I am interested in one that displays xfish.

For that matter, where can I get xfish?

Thanks for your help,

Brian


--
** Brian Klaas, Design Engineer     ***  DISCLAIMER:  All opinions           **
** Intel Corporation                ***     stated here are strictly my own. **
** InterNET ->  bklaas%cmdfs2.intel.com@relay.cs.NET                  UUCP:  **
** {hplabs,decwrl,oliveb,pur-ee,qantel,amdcad}!intelca!mipos3!sedona!bklaas  **

hughes@azroth.csee.usf.edu (Ken Hughes) (09/20/90)

In article <1990Sep19.103651@gila.intel.com>, bklaas@gila.intel.com
(Brian Klaas~) writes:
|>
|>Has anyone modified xlock to include different lockscreens (other then
|>qix and hopalong)?  I am interested in one that displays xfish.
|>
|>For that matter, where can I get xfish?
|>
|>Thanks for your help,
|>
|>Brian
|>
|>

For this matter, has anyone modified xlock so that it will accept a standard
X icon in place of the Sun logo?  It looks like it would be straightforward
but I haven't had the time to mess with it.
                
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ken Hughes  (hughes@sol.csee.usf.edu) |  "If you were happy every day of your
FT-Ph D student, PT-ex-sysadm	      |   your life you wouldn't be a human
Dept of Comp Sci and Eng	      |   being, you'd be a game show host."
University of South Florida	      |     Winona Ryder, from _Heathers_
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

sinkwitz@gorgo.ifi.unizh.ch (Rainer Sinkwitz) (09/26/90)

The primary goal of xlock is to easily lock out other users from your 
application. 

xlock doesn't only do this, but is locks up the whole console preventing other users
to use the X-Server and to log in.

So, what I'd like to see would be a xlock, that iconifies all Windows to one icon
that can only be opened by password and that leaves one xterm on the screen with
a login prompt. (e.g. getty). 

It then could do some funny things on the screen. 
It should also set aside the window manager ( in case one has a "new shell" menu in it).


Rainer Sinkwitz            | E-mail: sinkwitz@ifi.unizh.ch
Dept. of Computer Science  |     {backbone}!mcsun!unizh!sinkwitz
University of Zuerich      |         K114920@CZHRZU1A.bitnet
-- 
Thanks,...

Rainer Sinkwitz            | E-mail: sinkwitz@ifi.unizh.ch
Dept. of Computer Science  |     {backbone}!mcsun!unizh!sinkwitz

zjmw36@gpss36.trc.amoco.com (Joe M. Wade) (10/03/90)

In article <1990Sep26.162710.20503@gorgo.ifi.unizh.ch>,
sinkwitz@gorgo.ifi.unizh.ch (Rainer Sinkwitz) writes:
|> The primary goal of xlock is to easily lock out other users from your 
|> application. 
|> 
|> xlock doesn't only do this, but is locks up the whole console
preventing other users
|> to use the X-Server and to log in.
|> 
|> So, what I'd like to see would be a xlock, that iconifies all Windows
to one icon
|> that can only be opened by password and that leaves one xterm on the
screen with
|> a login prompt. (e.g. getty). 
|> 
|> It then could do some funny things on the screen. 
|> It should also set aside the window manager ( in case one has a "new
shell" menu in it).
|> 
But couldn't somebody who's using the same server just do something like an 
xwininfo and then xkill your windows (and applications) by their ids? I know 

this would be an underhanded thing to do, but some people don't play by the 
rules.

*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *
*  Joe M. Wade (jwade@trc.amoco.com)         (918) 660-4387    *
*  Amoco Research Center * 4502 E. 41st St. * Tulsa, OK  74102 *
*  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *