[comp.windows.x] Pencom's X11 Server

cristy@eplrx7.uucp (John Cristy) (04/23/91)

  I just received Pencom's X11 server and am having problems getting a
  few X clients to work.  The server has two odd attributes.  One is
  the bits-per-pixel for XImage's is 2.  And the blue mask for several
  of the visuals is 0.  Could a X wizard let me know if these
  attributes are legal under the current ICCCM?  Before I spend two
  much time adapting my X clients to Pencom's server, I want to verify
  it does not violate the ICCCM.

  The output from xdpyinfo for the StaticColor visual is:

    visual:
      visual id:    0x80066
      class:    StaticColor
      depth:    2 planes
      size of colormap:    4 entries
      red, green, blue masks:    0x1, 0x2, 0x0
      significant bits in color specification:    2 bits

  Thanks in advance.

  cristy@dupont.com
--
The UUCP Mailer

mouse@lightning.mcrcim.mcgill.EDU (der Mouse) (05/03/91)

> I just received Pencom's X11 server and am having problems getting a
> few X clients to work.  The server has two odd attributes.  One is
> the bits-per-pixel for XImage's is 2.

This is only partly Pencom's fault.  My original cfb port advertised a
bits-per-pixel value of 2, which was (and is :-) contrary to the
protocol.  I did not notice this until shortly before the X conference
last January; at the conference I asked someone - I think it was Keith
Packard - who told me that yes, I really shouldn't do that, but acted
understandably uncomfortable at telling me I'd have to expand
everything to 4 bits and then throw half of them away.  He seemed to
think the best thing would be to advertise a legal 4-bit format, but
also permit the 2-bit format.  Once I get back to hacking on mouse-X, I
think what I'll do is add an extension whose spec says that it does
nothing whatever except legalize this 2-bit format :-)

> And the blue mask for several of the visuals is 0.  Could a X wizard
> let me know if these attributes are legal under the current ICCCM?

It is not the ICCCM but the protocol with respect to which they would
have to be legal.

> The output from xdpyinfo for the StaticColor visual is:

They provide a StaticColor visual?  They have obviously done something
odd to the server.  My server provides a two-bit StaticGray visual and
that's it; I don't know what gives with their color visual.

					der Mouse

			old: mcgill-vision!mouse
			new: mouse@larry.mcrcim.mcgill.edu