rob@dadla.UUCP (Rob Vetter) (08/14/86)
In a recent statement, the NTSB (National Transportation and Safety Board) said that lap belts could cause injury (to kidneys, spine, and other lower viceral organs) in the case of an accident, and that they "don't know" if the benefits of wearing them outweigh the risks. The NTSB went further to state that shoulder straps, common in front seats, should be added to the belts in back. Many states now have seatbelt laws based partially on the NSTB's earlier findings. In Oregon, wearing belts is manditory for anyone under 16 - the group most often found in the back seats where lap belts are most prevalent. I opposed the Oregon law on Civil Rights grounds. Now, it appears that I COULD have opposed a manditory seatbelt law for SAFETY reasons. I'm still waiting for a report detailing the risks to the neck, clavicle, and chest when in an accident wearing the shoulder strap. -- Rob Vetter (503) 629-1044 [ihnp4, ucbvax, decvax, uw-beaver]!tektronix!dadla!rob "Waste is a terrible thing to mind" - NRC (Well, they COULD have said it)
showard@udenva.UUCP (Steve "Blore" Howard) (08/19/86)
In article <976@dadla.UUCP> rob@dadla (Rob Vetter) writes: > > In a recent statement, the NTSB (National Transportation and > Safety Board) said that lap belts could cause injury (to > kidneys, spine, and other lower viceral organs) in the case > of an accident, and that they "don't know" if the benefits of > wearing them outweigh the risks. > The results of that study apply only to back seat seatbelts ("back seat belts" sounds funny.) and only to head-on collisions. And, as with most studies and tests lately, the findings are being disputed by several people. -- "I've been Ayn Randed and nearly branded a communist 'cause I'm left-handed. That's the hand you use -- well, never mind" Steve "Blore" Howard, I.O.S.T. {hplabs, seismo}!hao!udenva!showard or {boulder, cires, ucbvax!nbires, cisden}!udenva!showard
korn@cory.Berkeley.EDU (Peter "Arrgh" Korn) (08/22/86)
In article <1897@udenva.UUCP> showard@udenva.UUCP (Steve "Blore" Howard) writes: >In article <976@dadla.UUCP> rob@dadla (Rob Vetter) writes: >> >> In a recent statement, the NTSB (National Transportation and >> Safety Board) said that lap belts could cause injury (to >> kidneys, spine, and other lower viceral organs) in the case >> of an accident, and that they "don't know" if the benefits of >> wearing them outweigh the risks. >> > The results of that study apply only to back seat seatbelts ("back >seat belts" sounds funny.) and only to head-on collisions. And, as >with most studies and tests lately, the findings are being disputed by >several people. I don't know the statistics on head-on collisions vs. non-head on collisions, but having been in the back seat of a head-on collision, I can assure you, all studies' evidence to the contrary, that I jack-knifed into the seat in front of me and messed up my face quite a bit. That wouldn't have happened had I been wearing a shoulder strap. Geeze, how hard can it be to put in shoulder straps in the rear as well as the front? It's easily worth an additional $20 in the cost of a new car. Peter P.S. Why is this in net.NEWS and not net.auto? ----- Peter "Arrgh" Korn "Fred Astaire? Heck, Ginger Rogers did korn@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU everything he did, backwards, {decvax,dual,hplabs,sdcsvax,ulysses}!ucbvax!korn and in high heels!"
campbell@maynard.UUCP (Larry Campbell) (08/22/86)
>P.S. Why is this in net.NEWS and not net.auto?
Yes indeed... PLEASE take this discussion out of net.news! Apparently
the original poster was not aware (and was too lazy to check) that
net.news is for discussions about the news software, NOT about random
current events. I have directed followups to net.auto.
--
Larry Campbell The Boston Software Works, Inc.
ARPA: campbell%maynard.uucp@harvard.ARPA 120 Fulton Street, Boston MA 02109
UUCP: {alliant,wjh12}!maynard!campbell (617) 367-6846