bunda@blitz.cs.utexas.edu (John Bunda) (06/29/88)
In article <385@csed-47.csed-1.IDA.ORG>, roskos@csed-1.IDA.ORG (Eric Roskos) writes: > > Test 5 would hang and never come back. ... > I remember correctly, it is because line 6706 uses m_sig.PROC_NR (which is > field m2_i2) and line 3156 uses m_ptr->CLOCK_PROC_NR, which is field > m6_i1. This caused all alarm signals to get sent to the wrong process. i went to edit the source for signal.c, and guess what--- my version of 1.2 has the change you are suggesting in it! i am running the vanilla 1.2 mm binary (i haven't rebuilt it). is it possible that the distributed binary is actually not built from the distributed source... nah, could never happen, right? ;-) i'm not sure what this means... -john bunda ut cs dept.