rlh2@ukc.ac.uk (Richard Hesketh) (10/16/88)
The subject says it all really. I have been compiling 1.3c+ over the weekend and have found that the header file const.h in the kernel sources is missing 80 bytes, these 80 bytes contain the definition for SECONDARY_VECTOR without which kernel/main.c refuses to compile. Please, could some kind soul mail me the absolutely upto date version of kernel/const.h which should be 2880 bytes long. Thanks in advance. Richard
paula@bcsaic.UUCP (Paul Allen) (10/19/88)
In article <5627@eagle.ukc.ac.uk> rlh2@ukc.ac.uk (Richard Hesketh) writes: >The subject says it all really. I have been compiling 1.3c+ over >the weekend and have found that the header file const.h in the >kernel sources is missing 80 bytes, these 80 bytes contain the >definition for SECONDARY_VECTOR without which kernel/main.c >refuses to compile. Please, could some kind soul mail me >the absolutely upto date version of kernel/const.h which should >be 2880 bytes long. I haven't started building 1.3c yet, but I'm most of the way through 1.3b. A grep for SECONDARY_VECTOR in my 1.3b/kernel directory revealed: const.h.rej:! #define SECONDARY_VECTOR 11 /* RS232 interrupt vector for port 2 */ main.c: set_vec(SECONDARY_VECTOR, secondary_int, base_click); Closer examination of const.h and const.h.rej showed that the 1.3b diff for const.h tried to remove the line defining SECONDARY_VECTOR, but patch rejected it. Since SECONDARY_VECTOR is used in kernel/main.c, is it safe to assume that the const.h diff was backwards? The 1.3b kernle/main.c diff *added* the reference to SECONDARY_VECTOR! Paul -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Paul L. Allen | paula@boeing.com Boeing Advanced Technology Center | ...!uw-beaver!ssc-vax!bcsaic!paula