[comp.os.minix] RE**N: Future of Minix --GNU

Leisner.Henr@xerox.com (marty) (07/22/89)

There really is no advantage to having a 386 specific assembler/linker
unless we're using 32 bit ints.

So it would appear the GNU assembler (gas) and linker don't buy much.

But on a system in 386 native mode (32 bit), some sorta virtual memory
enabled (I think this is gonna be important), Minix should be able to run
most of the GNU tools.

I've had far better experience with the gnu tools than the Minix tools
(sorry, that's the truth).  I agree small is beautiful, but small and
broken is ugly.  

I'd be much more excited about Minix (after playing with it for 2 years) if
it ran 386 protected mode with 32 bit ints, virtual memory and GNU C.  


marty
ARPA:	leisner.henr@xerox.com
GV:  leisner.henr
NS:  leisner:wbst139:xerox
UUCP:  hplabs!arisia!leisner