jdm1@eds1.UUCP (Jon McCown) (12/08/89)
(Apologies in advance if this is old news or previously discussed) I am building/have built v1.3 from the 1.2+Upgrade kit, and encountered the need to rebuild the libc.a so as to include such niceties as swab and strrchr. (no problem here) Using the "Zevon" library rebuild script, I let the machine crank on for a couple of hours, after which time it howled to a halt with a full hard disk. (this is a 10 meg partition!) Andy's notes indicate that the 'full' library took up a bit more space than the distributed one, but this amazed even me. Dissecting the library rebuild script ("run") and executing it in discrete steps, I noticed that what croaked the process was: cat /dev/null > newfile Which seemed innocent enough to me, until newfile (or whatever) grew to fill the HD. I haven't yet gotten into the FS code to look, but has anyone seen this before? My 1.3 is the one distributed in the ../src/tools of the upgrade kit, as I wanted to get the libc.a up to snuff before recompiling. Jon McCown Can't wait to get my hands on shoelace! -- J.D. McCown - RCSG Director - Senate of Pennsylvania psuvax1!eds1!jdm1 (this space intentionally "Your life or your lupins!" jdm1@eds1.eds.com filled with this text) - Dennis Moore
ching@snap.amd.com (Mike Ching) (12/08/89)
In article <424@eds1.UUCP> jdm1@eds1.UUCP (Jon McCown) writes:
-
-Dissecting the library rebuild script ("run") and executing it in
-discrete steps, I noticed that what croaked the process was:
-
-cat /dev/null - newfile
-
-Which seemed innocent enough to me, until newfile (or whatever) grew to
-fill the HD. I haven't yet gotten into the FS code to look, but has anyone
-seen this before?
I had the same problem and replaced the line with 'rm newfile ; touch newfile'
to create the file. There's another occurance of file creation in "run"
that I fixed the same way. I didn't try to figure out what is broken in
cat.
mike ching