[net.news.group] proposal to solve net.internat cris

tp@ndm20 (11/01/85)

>The current attitude of some people in the USA regarding net.internat is,
>as is often the case, arrogant and dismissive.  Their position speaks
>eloquently of the need to propagate the idea (which they so often blithely
>ignore) that the good ole US of A is *not* the World.

Your attitude is arrogant and dismissive!  You assume that the reason
net.internat  was  nuked  is  that  it  originated  in  europe, while
ignoring the  entire discussion  in net.news.group  explaining why is
was rmgrouped.  

Either:

1)  You  think  that  we  are all  anti-european bigots  putting up a
smoke-screen  and  lying  about  why  we rmgrouped  the message, that
reason being that WE HATE YOU.  (If this is  your opinion,  I have no
use for you so don't bother replying.)

2) You classify Gene Spafford thusly, and do not  believe his reasons
for his actions are sincere.  See above parenthetical comment.

3) You are possibly as bigotted you seem to think we are, in that you
lump us all together (exactly who is this "they" that  you refer to?)
and ignore what we say when it disagrees  with the  biases you choose
to hold (a rather common pattern, as  it is  the only  way bigots can
keep from reforming themselves).  You seem to think that the european
side of the net should be exempt  from the  rules regarding newsgroup
creation.  Care to justify that?  

Please  examine  your  own  thoughts  and  feelings  before you imply
prejudice in others.

The author of the quoted  text will  discount this  entire article as
being written by a defensive american bigot who has  no cognizance of
the rest of the world.  That will also  be for  one of  the 3 reasons
above (well  1 or  3 anyway).   I'm  not sure  I know  why I bothered
writing this.  Prejudice can not  be defeated  by words.   Bigots and
hypocrites are one of my pet peeves  and I  had to  get it  out of my
system.    The  author  above  is  probably  guilty  of  no more than
negligent  posting,  but  I've  seen  this  opinion  underlying  many
arguments on this topic, without being  stated so  plainly, that this
was my first chance to point it out.

Terry Poot
Nathan D. Maier Consulting Engineers
(214)739-4741
Usenet: ...!{allegra|ihnp4}!convex!smu!ndm20!tp
CSNET:  ndm20!tp@smu
ARPA:   ndm20!tp%smu@csnet-relay.ARPA