[comp.os.minix] bash for 32 Minix-pc ?

kemp@convex.com (Phil Kemp) (08/30/90)

I know that someone ported bash for MINIX-ST and now that I have Bruce's
32 bit kernel working, well for the most part :-), I am wondering if
any one has considered bash for the 32 bit PC. I would like to have a go
at this port if no one has already done it. In that vein, would whoever
ported bash to the ST drop me a line and maybe I could get some diffs to
get me started..

Thanks.
And thanks to all who helped me get the 32 bit kernel up and going with
the standard, non-shoelace, boot sequence.
PK


--
Phil Kemp
CONVEX Computer of Canada Ltd.
Voice:(403)-233-2815
UUCP:kemp@convex.com

dstailey@gnu.AI.MIT.EDU (Doug Stailey) (09/10/90)

In article <kemp.652028364@convex> kemp@convex.com (Phil Kemp) writes:
>I know that someone ported bash for MINIX-ST and now that I have Bruce's
>32 bit kernel working, well for the most part :-), I am wondering if
>any one has considered bash for the 32 bit PC. I would like to have a go
>at this port if no one has already done it. In that vein, would whoever
>ported bash to the ST drop me a line and maybe I could get some diffs to
>get me started..
>
>Thanks.
>And thanks to all who helped me get the 32 bit kernel up and going with
>the standard, non-shoelace, boot sequence.
>PK
>
>
>--
>Phil Kemp
>CONVEX Computer of Canada Ltd.
>Voice:(403)-233-2815
>UUCP:kemp@convex.com


J. Bammi has OK'd putting the ST MINIX bash 1.05 sources on
dsrgsun.ces.cwru.edu so I think I'll go downstairs and send it right
now, instead of being so lazy.  Yes it still core dumps on "history"
but I use <Ctrl-R> in emacs mode instead of !45 or whatever.

						Ken Stailey

						dstailey@gnu.ai.mit.edu
-- 
disclaimer: This message is sold by weight, not volume.  Contents may have
	    settled during shipment.