t901590@mp.cs.niu.edu (T.J. McNamee ) (02/23/91)
Hey, I've got a thought...why doesn't someone who received the whole origami posting upload it to a well known archive so that we who after seeing the original posting hosed deleted parts 3-5? That way we could lose the please re-post parts x y & z taking up half of the bandwidth on this newsgroup. Now there's a thought!
overby@plains.NoDak.edu (Glen Overby) (02/23/91)
In article <1991Feb22.184043.9638@mp.cs.niu.edu> t901590@mp.cs.niu.edu (T.J. McNamee ) writes: >origami posting upload it to a well known archive so that we who after >seeing the original posting hosed deleted parts 3-5? That way we could It's there, if you'd just look in the right place :-) I shovel bits into a directory as they come across comp.os.minix, and make it available via the archive-server (sorry, no ftp; it's on a different partition and is soft-linked in). If you miss something, try looking around with archive-server@plains index Minix/NEW index Minix/NEW/misc index Minix/NEW/pc index Minix/NEW/amiga (and so on) every now and then I pull the pieces of programs in NEW together and tar them up into files in the Minix/*contrib directories (those are available by anonymous FTP as pub/Minix/*contrib). For the heck of it, I've tossed the Origami posts in Minix/all.contrib/Origami/* -- Glen Overby <overby@plains.nodak.edu> uunet!plains!overby (UUCP) overby@plains (Bitnet)