[comp.os.minix] umheader.c Sender line

chris@sloth.bc.ca (Chris Brougham) (04/14/91)

Hello Everyone:

Why is the Sender line being written this way:


From SFSS_Office@cc.sfu.ca Mon,  8 Apr 91 03:46:11 remote from sloth
Path: sloth
From: SFSS_Office@cc.sfu.ca (unknown flag)
Received: by sloth.bc.ca (UMAIL 3.3/MINIX) with UUCP;
          Mon,  8 Apr 91 03:46:11 PDT
Sender: unknown flag <SFSS_Office@cc.sfu.ca@sloth.bc.ca>
Organization: sloth prince george, b.c.     ^^^^^^^^^^^-->This Can't 
To: sloth!chris@wimsey.bc.ca                              be right?
Subject: new subject              
Message-Id: <910408.AA0185@sloth.bc.ca>
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 91 22:36:48 PDT

 
---
chris brougham
chris@sloth.bc.ca

waltje@uwalt.nl.mugnet.org (Fred 'The Rebel' van Kempen) (04/16/91)

chris@sloth.bc.ca (Chris Brougham) wrote:
> 
> Hello Everyone:
> 
> Why is the Sender line being written this way:
> 
> 
> From SFSS_Office@cc.sfu.ca Mon,  8 Apr 91 03:46:11 remote from sloth
> Path: sloth
> From: SFSS_Office@cc.sfu.ca (unknown flag)
> Received: by sloth.bc.ca (UMAIL 3.3/MINIX) with UUCP;
>           Mon,  8 Apr 91 03:46:11 PDT
> Sender: unknown flag <SFSS_Office@cc.sfu.ca@sloth.bc.ca>
> Organization: sloth prince george, b.c.     ^^^^^^^^^^^-->This Can't 
> To: sloth!chris@wimsey.bc.ca                              be right?
> Subject: new subject              
> Message-Id: <910408.AA0185@sloth.bc.ca>
> Date: Sun, 7 Apr 91 22:36:48 PDT

Beats me, but looking at the version ID (3.3), it is _ancient_!
I put the current version, 3.49D, on Plains some time ago,
together with the new W-MAIL and such.  Use that, instead...

Fred.
--
MicroWalt Corporation, for MINIX Development	waltje@uwalt.nl.mugnet.org
Tel (+31) 252 230 205, Hoefbladhof  27, 2215 DV  VOORHOUT, The Netherlands
	"An Operating System is what the _USERS_ think of it- me"