jonathan@ukmug.uk.mugnet.org (Jonathan Allen) (06/04/91)
Reginald H. Beardsley (dprrhb@inetg1.ARCO.COM) wrote: > Jonathan Allen (jonathan@ukmug.uk.mugnet.org) wrote: >> AFAIK, the real concern at PH is actually that they know that AM is >> BETTER (in some ways) than 'standard' MINIX > Better than PH's distribution? For what? Andy put a LOT of work into > creating Minix in the first place. What goes (or does not go) into PH > is his call. What goes into your system is your call. However, the > carping above is bad manners. You should apologize. > I'm currently using 1.5.10 from PH (a bargain at full list!) with > Spivey's buffer cache, Oliver's shared text, Housel's fp, and > Helmer's bootblok. There are problems sometimes, but all in all > it's pretty nice. Case proved M'lud ! You run the additions because they feel 'better' to you, or provide a facility that isn't in the vanilla. I did NOT intend any offence or slur to the work that Andy has put in over the years - I had hoped that was obvious - I run closer to vanilla than you. If the net - or Andy - took offence, please accept my apologies. Jonathan