[rec.birds] Conformity and survival

john@nmtsun.nmt.edu (John Shipman) (01/14/90)

Kehaar (R. Cody Buchmann, rcb33483@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu) writes:
+---
| ...I was a teenage birder...
+---

(-: This is a new horror film, no? :-)

+---
| But I also showed a career interest in birds, so I was
| the target of a tremendous amount of abuse.... Perhaps
| the secret of getting more teenaged birders here is to
| look for outcasts...
+---

Your remark about outcast birders is probably true in lots
of situations, but in some circles it is not treated as such
a silly thing.  Also, I don't have much respect for people
who let the trendy people tell them what to do.  Not only
would the world be a pretty boring place if everyone
conformed, but I think we'd be in big trouble as a species.

As a student of biology, you can appreciate how important
diversity and flexibility are for survival.  Birds who
become too well adapted to a specific situation, like
flightless rails on small Pacific islands, are in trouble if
the situation changes: many island birds have been wiped out
by the introduction of cats or rats.  Birds that can live in
a wide variety of niches, like crows and mockingbirds, are
widespread and still spreading; they would probably be in
good shape to survive a major catastrophe like a large
meteor strike.  Species and habitat diversity is one of the
most critical natural assets (that we're squandering).

Similarly, I think our species is better off tolerating or
even encouraging lots of different lifestyles and
philosophies: it's just good biology---we never know what
sorts of strategies might be more useful in the long run, so
let's try a lot of them out, and let's try to be more
tolerant of people who don't act, dress or act like we do.

(-: I just can't STAND people who are intolerant. :-)
-- 
John Shipman/Zoological Data Processing/Socorro, New Mexico
USENET: ucbvax!unmvax!nmtsun!john  CSNET: john@nmtsun.nmt.edu
``Let's go outside and commiserate with nature.''  --Dave Farber