dgraham@kean.ucs.mun.ca (David Graham) (08/30/90)
Just wanted to reiterate what Daan Sandee and Mike Mahler have already said, which is that a vote in favour of rec.pets.dogs is probably the best thing you can do in the short term to help solve the 'inappropriate postings' problem. IMHO, of course... I haven't seen any good birds lately, as it happens, though we did have a great outing down to La Manche (abandoned community on the coast of Newfoundland south of St John's, from which people were relocated about 30 years ago) last weekend, and I did see some whales just offshore, and picked 1/2 bucket of wild raspberries and a bucket of blueberries. One commic tern heading south, and a lot of gulls... *************************************************************************** David Graham dgraham@kean.ucs.mun.ca ***************************************************************************
sandee@sun16 (Daan Sandee) (08/31/90)
In article <130214@kean.ucs.mun.ca> dgraham@kean.ucs.mun.ca (David Graham) writes: >Just wanted to reiterate what Daan Sandee and Mike Mahler have already >said, which is that a vote in favour of rec.pets.dogs is probably the >best thing you can do in the short term to help solve the >'inappropriate postings' problem. IMHO, of course... > Thanks, David. And I do want to point out that as the whole problem started by the pet bird people having problems finding the parakeets among the dog shit on rec.pets, it is THEY ESPECIALLY who should vote YES to rec.pets.dogs. It would solve THEIR problem ; and, incidentally, stop of the flame wars on this newsgroup. >*************************************************************************** > David Graham dgraham@kean.ucs.mun.ca >*************************************************************************** Daan Sandee sandee@sun16.scri.fsu.edu Supercomputer Computations Research Institute Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4052 (904) 644-7045