[rec.ham-radio] PC board photo etching kits

ornitz@kodak.UUCP (barry ornitz) (07/08/87)

In article <2392@uwmcsd1.UUCP> neighbor@csd4.milw.wisc.edu.UUCP (Jeffrey Alan Ding) writes:
>
>Hello.  Does anybody out there etch PC boards?  I have a kit from
>GC electronics that uses chemicals to transfer a pattern onto the PC board.
>The artwork for the pattern is done on transparent plasic.  The artwork is
>placed onto a PC board which is photo sensitized and exposed to Ultra Violet
>light.  Then the PC board is developed and the pattern appears on the
>PC board.  This method is very useful if multiple PC boards are wanted having
>the same circuit design.
>
>I'm wondering if anybody out there has used this stuff.  I'm having a bit
>of trouble photo sensitizing my own PC boards.  I've tried the process
>with PRE-sensitized boards and it works great.  But the boards that I
>sensitize do not work at all.  If any of you have any experience doing
>this I would appreciate any info on how to make it work.  Oh one more thing,
>I'm using POSITIVE method.  There are both positive and negative methods.

Jeff, I sensitize my own boards most of the time with consistently good results
using Kodak KPR resist which unfortunately Kodak recently sold the rights to
another company.  Resist of this type has a definite shelf life and is quite
sensitive about how it is stored.  I have rarely had any luck using the spray-
on resists sold by GC, etc.  This products rarely sells quickly and is useless
if overheated in the can.  You might consider the Photo-Blue or Photo-Green
(tm ?) presensitized boards which develop in a non-solvent developer which is
much safer to use.  If you really want the high definition needed for complex
PC boards, you will probably have to go with the KPR type resists.

Now for a plug - especially since Kodak sold off their interests.

Buy the book, "Electronic Prototype Construction" by Stephen D. Kasten.  This
book is published by Howard W. Sams (ISBN 0-672-21895-X) and can be ordered
through most major electronic distributors.  The cost is about $18 and your
money will be very well spent.  Steve presents some of the most practical
information I have seen on the subject.  The book is well suited to beginners
as well as more experienced users.  The book is full of photographs and
illustrations and is a storehouse of useful tips.  Even if you value your time
at next to nothing, this book will save you money.  All hams and electronic
experimenters should have a copy.

If this sounds like a blatant ad, it is.  Steve is a coworker and close 
personal friend.  I feel as if I have created a monster because I was the one
to introduce Steve to hamfests as a source of electronic goodies and junque.
It seems that on every occasion, he is working on a new project with parts
he bought at a hamfest.  Buy his book - he needs the royalties to buy more parts
and supplies.  Seriously, his book is every bit as good as I said it was!
                                                Barry
 -----------------
|  ___  ________  |
| |  / /        | |  Dr. Barry L. Ornitz   UUCP:...!rochester!kodak!ornitz
| | / /         | |  Eastman Kodak Company
| |< < K O D A K| |  Eastman Chemicals Division Research Laboratories
| | \ \         | |  P. O. Box 1972
| |__\ \________| |  Kingsport, TN  37662       615/229-4904
|                 |
 -----------------

hoffman@pitt.UUCP (Bob Hoffman) (07/08/87)

In article <885@kodak.UUCP> ornitz@kodak.UUCP (barry ornitz) writes:
>In article <2392@uwmcsd1.UUCP> neighbor@csd4.milw.wisc.edu.UUCP (Jeffrey Alan Ding) writes:
>>
>>Hello.  Does anybody out there etch PC boards?  I have a kit from
>>GC electronics that uses chemicals to transfer a pattern onto the PC board.
  ...
>>I'm wondering if anybody out there has used this stuff.  I'm having a bit
>>of trouble photo sensitizing my own PC boards.  I've tried the process
>>with PRE-sensitized boards and it works great.  But the boards that I
>>sensitize do not work at all.  If any of you have any experience doing
>>this I would appreciate any info on how to make it work.  Oh one more thing,
>>I'm using POSITIVE method.  There are both positive and negative methods.
  ...
>I have rarely had any luck using the spray-
>on resists sold by GC, etc.  This products rarely sells quickly and is useless
>if overheated in the can.

I have used the GC negative-acting photoresist with excellent results, but I
had a fresh can.  I guess I was lucky!  What Barry says is true about its
aging properties.  I have learned that if the spray comes out a dark purple
color, then it's OK.  If it comes out yellowish, it's shot.  Another important
thing is extreme cleanliness of the board being sensitized -- this means taking
scouring powder to clean any oxidation and oil off the board.  Use 600-grit
wet emery paper or steel wool if necessary.  I don't like steel wool for the
bits of steel it leaves behind.  That board should positively GLEAM when you're
done.  Then, handle it only by the edges -- the oil on your fingers is enough
to screw up the photoresist.

-- 
Bob Hoffman, N3CVL       {allegra, bellcore, cadre, idis, psuvax1}!pitt!hoffman
Pitt Computer Science    hoffman%pitt@relay.cs.net

deann@auscso.UUCP (DeAnn Kiser) (07/10/87)

 Just a note to say "Hi" from a fellow Kodaker down in Austin, Texas.
            
                                                  Les G. Kiser
                                                  Field Service Rep.
                                                   (Ektaprint)

dale@amc-vlsi.UUCP ( AMC Staff) (07/10/87)

In article <5775@pitt.UUCP>, hoffman@pitt.UUCP (Bob Hoffman) writes:

> thing is extreme cleanliness of the board being sensitized -- this means taking
> scouring powder to clean any oxidation and oil off the board.  Use 600-grit
> wet emery paper or steel wool if necessary.  I don't like steel wool for the
> bits of steel it leaves behind.  That board should positively GLEAM when you're
> done.  Then, handle it only by the edges -- the oil on your fingers is enough
> to screw up the photoresist.


      In my most recent employment I was involved in P.W.B. prototype
fabrication both single and double sided. The problems with steel wool
pieces are solved using 600-grit emery paper, however this is still
too abrasive and you remove more cladding than you should. The best
cleaning method that we developed is as follows:

- Cut appropiate size board, and debur edges.

-Hot water, Comet (household cleanser), and Scotch-Brite.
      The hot water and comet remove the oxidization with the
      aid of the synthetic material scotch-brite. I don't
      know the commercial usage of the stuff but it will rip
      your skin off if you miss the pwb as your doing your
      work. The scotch-brite has added advantages, its cheap
      doesn't leave any residue etc.

- Rinse board in clean hot water, towel dry and immediately
  rinse with isopropal and allow to air dry on edge.

      We found that the board would positively "GLEAM" after
these steps were taken. Also process your cards as soon as you
can as oxidization has no concience. If you can't, leave them
in a isopropal bath until your ready.

Try it!

Dale K. Wlasitz

lars@sdcsvax.UCSD.EDU (Lars Poulsen) (07/25/87)

In article <371@amc-vlsi.UUCP> dale@amc-vlsi.UUCP ( AMC Staff) writes:
>         ... the synthetic material scotch-brite. I don't
>      know the commercial usage of the stuff but it will rip
>      your skin off if you miss the pwb as your doing your
>      work. The scotch-brite has added advantages, its cheap ...
The manufacturer's intended use of Scotch-Brite is to clean
sinks, pots and pans. Yes, it is often used in conjunction with
"the commercial cleaner Comet".

Available in every Grocery store .... Cheers for reality.
/ Lars Poulsen