PEDRO@ohstpy.mps.ohio-state.edu (Pedro Saizar (614-292-7881)) (09/22/89)
In article <45930@bbn.COM>, rshapiro@bbn.com (Richard Shapiro) writes: > Comments? I'm all for it! But the name didn't tell me anything either. I think TV and short-wave radio listening are quite different kind of activities even if the physics is the same. I'd be more interested in a group just on radio listening, but you have my vote whatever is proposed. Pedro
newsadm@pioneer.arc.nasa.gov (System News Administrator) (09/23/89)
In article <Sep.21.16.44.49.1989.24611@NET.BIO.NET> lear@NET.BIO.NET (Eliot Lear) writes:
=>How about rec.short-wave, to help the war against tla's.
If we want to use chuq's idea and include scanners et al into
the group why don't we call it rec.monitoring or some such thing?
Charles
+ *READ* ---> The opinions expressed above are to the best of my knowledge, +
+ however all options should be discussed with persons who have professional+
+ training with the subjects covered here. * ALL POSSIBLE DISCLAIMERS APPLY!+
+===>FROM: newsadm@pioneer.arc.nasa.gov Pioneer's USENET ADMINISTRATOR +