[rec.video] Questions on video camera

gsutiono@alias.com (Guno Sutiono) (04/05/91)

We are looking for some information regarding the geometry of video camcorder 
optics, specifically field of view determination from physical camera settings.

Any help would be appreciated...

Q1. Is there a standard for CCD size specification in a video camera ?
    For instance, if my video camera has a 1/2" CCD, does this imply that
    there are specific dimensions for CCD size? If so, what are they ? In
    what standard dimensions are CCD's commonly available?
 
Q2. Based on the pinhole camera model, the field of view (FOV) can be
    determined by the film size (e.g. 35mm film) and the associated lens'
    focal length (e.g. 50mm) by using the equation: 
               FOV = 2 * arctan( 0.5 * film size / focal length )
    When will this pinhole camera break down in reality ?

Q3. In the case of video camera, can we just substitute the "film size" 
      variable in the previous equation with the "CCD sensor size" ?

Q4. The commercial CamCorders that are available nowadays use
      terminology such as 6X, 8X, or 10X to specify the power of the zoom 
      factor they support.  Is there an industrial standard method for 
      mapping these zoom factors to range of focal length ?
      e.g. It seems that 8X implies an 8.5~68mm lens and 10X implies an
      8~80mm lens in a 1/2" CCD video camcorder.

Q5. Is the image captured from a video camera appearing on a TV
      monitor a cropped representation of what is on the CCD (specifically,
      is it possible for the optical centre of the image on a TV monitor 
      to be offset in image space from the optical centre of the image
      falling on the CCD) ?  If so, how can we determine the offset ?
      Are there any other transformations which are applied to the image
      falling on the CCD during its conversion to a video signal?

Q6. Can we generalize the above approach for obtaining field of view to a
     movie camera ?

goldberg@oasys.dt.navy.mil (Mark Goldberg) (04/05/91)

In article <1991Apr4.200358.2223@alias.com> gsutiono@alias.com (Guno Sutiono) writes:
>Q1. Is there a standard for CCD size specification in a video camera ?
In what standard dimensions are CCD's commonly available? 

    1/2" and 2/3" CCDs are the defacto standard.  Consumer and some
    compact pro cameras use 1/2". A few consumer units used 2/3" CCD
    (like the JVC GFS-1000 SVHS camcorder) but now 1/2" is the usual.
    CCDs are also described in terms of pixels (picture elements).
    The important figure of merit is EFFECTIVE PIXELS.  That is because
    the image are that's  used is really smaller than the total number
    on the chip.  Video has a 3V:4H aspect ratio like super-8 and 16mm
    film.  While I personally don't know that actual effective image
    dimensions for video camera CCDs, the 2/3" units basically use 16mm
    film optics and the 1/2" units are similar to super-8.  I think
    the 1/2 or 2/3 inch refers to the image raster diagonal, similar
    to expression of TV screen size.

>Q2/3. Based on the pinhole camera model, the field of view (FOV) can
be determined by the film size (e.g. 35mm film) and the associated lens'
focal length (e.g. 50mm) by using the equation:
FOV = 2 * arctan( 0.5 * film size / focal length )
When will this pinhole camera break down in reality ?

    It basically holds.  But you must know the effective image dimensions
    on the chip.  You would need to have three equations:  one each
    for vertical, horizontal, and diagonal fields of view based on those
    respective distances on the chip for an effective focal length.
    Realize that the true focal length or a fixed lens or zoom at a
    particular setting does vary slightly with focussed distance.  When
    estimating the coverage of my lenses for a job, it's easier for
    me to ditch the trigonomentry and use simple ratio-proportion:

	 raster height on CCD            coverage height
	 --------------------     =    -----------------------
	    focal length                cam-to-subj distance

>
>Q4. Is there an industrial standard method for mapping zoom factors 
to range of focal length?  It seems that 8X implies an 8.5~68mm lens 
and 10X implies an 8~80mm lens in a 1/2" CCD video camcorder.

    Zoom factors (eg 8x, 10x, 16x, ...) express the focal length ratio
    maximum (at telephoto) to minimum (a widest setting).  A particular
    zoom ratio DOES NOT imply a specific minimum f.l.  For example,
    A Panasonic camcorder may have 8-64, while a Sony Hi-8 model has
    11.5-95.  Professional video lenses are designated without this
    ambiguity, like "J15x9.5" or "A12x10.5" meaning 15x ratio with 9.5
    mm minimum focal length and 12x with 10.5mm minimum f.l. respectively.

>Q5. Is the image captured from a video camera appearing on a TV
monitor a cropped representation of what is on the CCD (specifically, 
is it possible for the optical centre of the image on a TV monitor to 
be offset in image space from the optical centre of the image falling 
on the CCD) ?  If so, how can we determine the offset ? Are there any 
other transformations which are applied to the image falling on the 
CCD during its conversion to a video signal?

    TVs always have a certain degree of overscan - that is, a cerain
    amount of cropping occurs.  That's why studio always place graphics
    and captions within the "safe title area."  Some studio systems
    supimpose the safe lines in the image on their viewfinders and monitors
    to aid in proper composition.  Professional monitors have an UNDERSCAN
    function which shrinks the scanning raster, enabling technicians
    to see the whole transmitted image.   Since overscanning is not
    necessarily geometrically uniform, the true picture center may not
    be consistent when viewed at home or on a consumer VCR/monitor.

    Also realize that everything that the a sensing chip has a particular
    output vs. illumination curve.  There is a saturation point on top
    and a pedestal on the bottom.  A CCD is basically an analog sensor.
    As the signal is transmitted and processed, numerous alterations
    and distortions occur.  IMHO, the greatest of these is the encoding
    or the luminance and chrominance into a composite video signal.
    That's why contemporary video production systems try to postpone
    this encoding as long as possible and work with a Y/C or
    Y/R-Y/B-Y COMPONENT signal.
>
>Q6. Can we generalize the above approach for obtaining field of view to a
movie camera ?

    The geometric computation works, no matter what the medium.  Even
    in film, some inevitable cropping will occur in the post production
    steps if optical printing is used.

=========David Taylor Research Center (a US Navy lab) - Annapolis, MD==========
    /|/| /||)|/  /~_/\| |\|)[~|)/~_  |  "Everyone's entitled to MY opinion."
   / | |/~||\|\  \_/\/|_|/|)[_|\\_/  |      goldberg@oasys.dt.navy.mil
"Poor is the man whose pleasure depends on the permission of another."-Madonna