[rec.arts.startrek] Drooling trekkies

COK@PSUVMA.BITNET (R. W. F. Clark) (04/04/88)

smeyer@topaz.rutgers.edu (Seth Meyer) drools profusely:                         u (Seth Meyer) says:

>In article <1547@ut-emx.UUCP> legare@ut-emx.UUCP (Dr. Robert Tech) writes:

[A wonderful artistic use of the words "FUCKHEADS."  The spacing he used
managed to convey a sense of desperation mingled with anger _perfectly_.]

>
>Did we have a bad day [sic] Dr. Robert Tech?
>If you're a doctor, couldn't you find a way of expressing your views
>without using such immature language?

As a doctor, he uses the most precise and accurate methods of describing
and labelling what he encounters.  He encountered "FUCKHEADS."
He called them "FUCKHEADS."  Got that, FUCKHEAD?

>
>Well, 'Doctor', you're [sic] point is a valid one, but I do not want to see
>this type of posting in rec.arts.startrek.  Let's review what we could
>do to avoid seeing these articles you hate to read:
>
>1)  You can make a kill file.  It's not too hard and won't take up
>    that much space.
>
>2)  You could unsubscribe to talk.bizzare [sic].

Listen, FUCKHEAD, BoB teCh _is_ talk.bizarre.  It wouldn't be
a matter as simple an unsubscribing.  And are _we_ supposed to
unsubscribe to _our_ own fucking froup because FUCKHEADS from
other froups cross-post _their_ shit over here without having
the faintest idea what talk.bizarre is?  Sounds rather unfair,
actually.  With yer logic, you ought to consider joining the PLO.
You'd get along with them just _fantastically_.

>
>3)  You could make a posting to rec.arts.startrek asking them not to
>    cross-post 'SIXTEEN FOLLOWUPS' to talk.bizzare.

All right, spud.  This line is particularly irritating.  Now listen
to this next bit ve-e-e-e-ery closely:

WE FUCKING POSTED AT LEAST FUCKING FIFTY FUCKING POLITE FUCKING
REQUESTS TO YOUR FUCKING NEWSFROUP TO _KNOCK OFF THE FUCKING
CROSS-POSTING_!  THE FIRST FEW WERE FUCKING POLITE, GOT THAT?
THEN WE KEPT GETTING THIS FUCKING SHIT OVER HERE, AND BoB teCH
(a. k. a. God) FUCKING GOT A LITTLE FUCKING IRRITATED.

THEN WE GET YOUR FUCKING ILLITERATE MORONIC FUCKING POST.
PARDON ME IF I'M JUST A LITTLE FUCKING PISSED.

WE'VE ALREADY FUCKING DONE JUST ABOUT EVERYTHING YOU
SO FUCKING POLITELY SUGGESTED AND YOU FUCKHEADS JUST
FUCKING KEPT IT UP ANYWAY.  YOUR SUGGESTIONS ARE
FUCKING USELESS.

>

>Now I did something similar to what you did but I did it a little
>nicer [sic], and I'm only a soph. [sic] in college.  You see, not every site
>gets rec.arts.startrek, so postings are done [sic] in other groups, like
>rec.arts.sf-lovers.

Like fucking talk.bizarre, moron?  Why not just edit the newsfroups
line?  It would make this business _so_ much easier for both of
us.

Goddamn drooling trekkie.

>
>Another thing:  WRITING IN THIS STYLE IS OBNOXIOUS!!!

Another thing:  You are a crepuscular heap of festering garbage.

>
>Thank you.

You're not welcome.
            *
Now fuck off.

>
>

* "Now fuck off." is a registered trademark of Dr. Robert P. Tech, Inc.

[Note:  This is not a flame.  Flames don't consist of using all
caps and repeating "FUCKING" over and over again.  If you want
flames, keep up this drivel and we'll be forced to drag out
the gweggie monster.]
-------
UUCP:. . .rutgers!psuvax1!psuvma.BITNET!cok  R W Clark/GFC Gang/Port Atherton

richard@gryphon.CTS.COM (Richard Sexton) (04/06/88)

In article <Apr.4.20.18.30.1988.13430@topaz.rutgers.edu> smeyer@topaz.rutgers.edu (Seth Meyer) writes:
>In article <3122@gryphon.CTS.COM> richard@gryphon.CTS.COM (Richard Sexton) writes:
>>In article <38117COK@PSUVMA> yer mama writes:
>>>smeyer@topaz.rutgers.edu (Seth Meyer) drools profusely:                      
>>>>Did we have a bad day Dr. Robert Tech?
>>>>3)  You could make a posting to rec.arts.startrek asking them not to
>>>>    cross-post 'SIXTEEN FOLLOWUPS' to talk.bizzare.
>>>
>>
>>Just what the FUCK do you against my followups ? Where does this moron
>>get off thinking followups are ok as long as they ARNT a SEXTON followup ?
>
 >Okay, Richard...its okay...take it easy...start at 10 and count down
>to one and take deeeeep breaths...very good.
>
>Now grow up.
>
>>Egads, the gall of some people.
>
>Egads, the immaturity of some people.
>

(Putting on a trish kind of voice)

So like, is this guy Mr. Maturity or what ?


Perhaps this will help:

I refuse to litter every one of my postings with dozens of those fucking 
":-)"'s just to appease people whose parody detectors are out of commission.

Trust me, when I mean to insult you, you'll KNOW.
					-James Wilbur Lewis



In article <923@ddsw1.UUCP> karl@ddsw1.UUCP (Karl Denninger) writes:
>In article <38117COK@PSUVMA> yer mama writes:
>$smeyer@topaz.rutgers.edu (Seth Meyer) drools profusely:                         u (Seth Meyer) says:
>$
>$>In article <1547@ut-emx.UUCP> legare@ut-emx.UUCP (Dr. Robert Tech) writes:
>$
>$[A wonderful artistic use of the words "F#$@HEADS."  The spacing he used
>$managed to convey a sense of desperation mingled with anger _perfectly_.]
>
>$[A large rant]
>
> >Yes, I cross-posted this to talk.bizarre intentionally.

>Aha! So you were one of the people who cross-posted.

Jeezus ! How'd you figure it out ?

>Karl, it has come to my attention that there are a few people who
>don't like your cross-posting onto talk.bizarre.  Although I really
>have no problem with this, I wanted to tell you, since it appears

Thats right seth old buddy. You just wanted to tell Karl something.
And you couldnt use email, oh no no no. Out of Estamps friebd ?

Hey, no probs. Talk.bizarre worked out a deal with the post office
and you can buy estamps there now. Go buy some.

Use them.

>You '.startrek people'...  Do you always generalize people from a few
>of their group?  This is very dangerous, Cindy, and very prejudiced.

Yes, you startrek people. 

Whats the difference between a "startrek people" and a rock ?

Me either.


In article <4552@chinet.UUCP> rissa@chinet.UUCP (Patricia O Tuama) writes:
>Someone else we've never heard of writes:
>>> Perhaps we're redundant.  Do you realize that there are only 17 original
>>> story settings and everything written is based on one of those?

>>Actually it would seem that there are only 17 original postings
>>and you all there in SF spend all your time rushing about from
>>one to another continuously following-up the same things over 
>>and over again.  

>Let me ask you this darling:  Did you start to notice how people in
>talk.bizarre, within 24 hours, have followed up to my posting more
>times than any other posting in rec.arts.startrek (within 24 hours).
iIn flaming me, you have accomplished the very thing you were flaming
>me for.

Just where do you get off asking trish a hard question ?

Hard questions are why we fucking well read t.b, to get away from hard
questions. Especially real fucking hard ones.

Please ask somebody who gives a fuck.

>> Please don't bother flaming me.  I'll be mature enough not to pay attention
>>> to this twice.

Hang on, let me get this right. You bumble in here, flame away and then say
"please dont flame me ?"  Hmm, can you say "neophyte" Well, again, me either.
But since you are obviously new here let me help you, youngster.

Try:  flames to dev/null or please flame me.


Now look you star trek people, I really hate to make threats, but if this
"seth" creature is the best you've got, you're in trouble.

We have these two things which we affectionatly call "nowak" and "talmadge"
if if you arnt carefull, they will all of a sudden develop a real strong
intrest in star trek. They will post. My god how they will post. They
will post till tears run down your leg. You volume will go up up up.
You will be the #1 group on all of USENET. Jim Sitek will then suggest
that the startrek group should be cut off. Then nowak, talmadge and probably
this "seth" creature will argue wildly in news.admin and star trek will
get cut off from many sites, including new mexico.

Is this what you want ?

Good. Keep it up.

In the meantime, some things to ponder:

1) Why is spocks blood green ?

2) What color are the "yellow" uniforms ?

3) What is the accepted list of abbreviations ?

4) Why is Kirk such a meanie ?

5) Are spock and kirk really gay ?

6) Why are the red-shirts the first to go ?


There that should keep your tiny minds amused.
It has for the last 10 years.


-- 
                    Remember me. Mangle my muffin.
   richard@gryphon.CTS.COM                  rutgers!marque!gryphon!richard