[rec.arts.startrek] Problems with propagation of r.a.s.info and other comments

trek-info@scam.Berkeley.EDU (Jim "The Big Dweeb" Griffith) (02/07/90)

Sigh.  I've been flooded with mail from people saying that either their
site hasn't got r.a.s.info as a new group, or they have, but they've
received no new articles.  FYI, to date, I have posted 7 articles with
a world distribution.

What I would appreciate your doing, for those of you that can, is to go
to your news servers, and look for the junk directory.  See if there is
an entry for r.a.s.info there.  If so, then your site has probably been
told about the group, and it is receiving the articles I post, but it
has opted not to propagate it.  In that event, you need to talk to
whoever manages news at your site and try to talk them into propagating
the group.  Any site which propagates r.a.s.  will probably be willing
to propagate r.a.s.info.  Please use discretion here - don't badger
your sys-admins unrelentlessly.  I don't want to cause problems that
threaten the group's existance.

People have written to me saying "I can't get the group, please
cross-post articles in the group to r.a.s until I can".  The purpose of
r.a.s.info is not to replace r.a.s., any more than the purpose of
rec.humor.funny is to replace rec.humor.  The purpose of the group is
to weed out discussions, garbage, and other line noise and provide a
source of Star Trek information with a significantly high
signal-to-noise ratio.  I don't expect people to post exclusively to
r.a.s.info.  What I'd prefer is if you have something of interest, post
it to r.a.s., and then submit it to me.  This goes for after all of the
problems are resolved, as well as for right now.

				Jim

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Edited by Jim Griffith - the official scapegoat of rec.arts.startrek.info

E-mail submissions to trek-info@scam.berkeley.edu or ...!ucbvax!scam!trek-info