mrspock@hubcap.UUCP (Steve Benz) (04/07/88)
jdm@gryphon.CTS.COM (John Mesiavech): } In article <495@Lindy.STANFORD.EDU> kevin@Lindy.Stanford.EDU (Kevin J. Burnett) writes: }> }>Am I the only one who finds these in-group ravings over the whole net }>obnoxious? Why are there so many groups in the Newsgroups: line? }>... }>Kevin Burnett } } } (look of wonderment as this person's idiodicy) (Look of wonderment that this person's parents let him survive this long) } } Kevin, (he said gently) } } The answer to your question is at once painfully clear, and painfully } obvious to anyone who has followed ANY of the above newsgroups. It's } Real Easy, you see.... } } The original twit who posted the LBJ to talk.bizarre also crossposted } to rec.games.frp and to the other group mentioned in the header line. So, } any followups were automagically crossposted. Stupid people should not be allowed to post news. If you want to post a followup, fine, but all you have to do, you silly twit, is to remove the unwanted newsgroups from the Newsgroup line when you write your assinine followups. } Now, any followups to } THIS message will only get posted to talk.bizarre, Actually, you're completely wrong again. They'll also get cross-posted to rec.games.frp as well, by default. People with some sense can modify the newsgroup distribution to something appropriate. } so go ahead and try to f } flame. We shall toast you, roast you, and eat you for breakfast. Yet another error (* Could there be more? *) My melting point is very high. The net can't conduct temperatures hot enough to roast me. } Next time, read the bleedin' messages before you followup. Mebbe then } you'll gain a sense of history...as in, What Has Gone Before. Some folks have better things to do than to read 700 pages of talk.bizarre. I guess you don't. } John } } } } -- } } 0-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-> All disclaimers apply; I didn't write this <-=-=-=-=-=-0 } | ----------------------|------------------- | } | "Sing us a song, you're the Piano Man | John Mesiavech | } | Sing us a Song Tonight | net.soldier.of.fortune | } | For we're all in the mood for a melody | {backbone}!gryphon!jdm | } | And you've got us feeling allright" | Go Purdue! (by req) | } | - Billy Joel, "Piano Man" | | } 0-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-0 Not only are you a fool, but your .signature is too long. - Steve "I got no .signature" Benz mrspock@hubcap.clemson.edu ...!gatech!hubcap!mrspock
okunewck@gondor.cs.psu.edu (Phil OKunewick) (04/08/88)
In article <1325@hubcap.UUCP> mrspock@hubcap.UUCP (Steve Benz) flames: >jdm@gryphon.CTS.COM (John Mesiavech): >} In article <495@Lindy.STANFORD.EDU> kevin@Lindy.Stanford.EDU (Kevin J. Burnett) writes: >}> [flame that has been reflamed by a flame that was later flamed] >} [flame of the first flame, which is about to be flamed itself] > [flaming of the flame of the first flame] >} [continuation of the flaming of the first flame, included for the purpose >} of a more effective flame of the flame of the first flame] > [more flaming of the flame of the first flame] [more of the same flame sturcture] [more of the same flame sturcture] [still more of the same flame sturcture (you get the picture)] >} [ A moderately long signature, just achin' to be flamed.] The flame of the .signature: > Not only are you a fool, but your .signature is too long. > > - Steve "I got no .signature" Benz > mrspock@hubcap.clemson.edu > ...!gatech!hubcap!mrspock And now, with the flames properly burning, it's my turn: Your userid is silly. ---Duck
jdm@gryphon.CTS.COM (John Mesiavech) (04/09/88)
In article <1325@hubcap.UUCP> mrspock@hubcap.UUCP (Steve Benz) writes: >jdm@gryphon.CTS.COM (John Mesiavech): >} In article <495@Lindy.STANFORD.EDU> kevin@Lindy.Stanford.EDU (Kevin J. Burnett) writes: >}> [some drivel from Kevin Burnett] >} (look of wonderment as this person's idiodicy) > > (Look of wonderment that this person's parents let him survive this long) > >} >} Kevin, (he said gently) >} >} The answer to your question is at once painfully clear, and painfully >} obvious to anyone who has followed ANY of the above newsgroups. It's >} Real Easy, you see.... >} >} The original twit who posted the LBJ to talk.bizarre also crossposted >} to rec.games.frp and to the other group mentioned in the header line. So, >} any followups were automagically crossposted. > > Stupid people should not be allowed to post news. If you want to >post a followup, fine, but all you have to do, you silly twit, is to >remove the unwanted newsgroups from the Newsgroup line when you write >your assinine followups. > mrspock, you obviously don't know News software. Any message that has a "Followup-To" line in its header, any followups automagically get posted to ONLY THE NEWSFROUP THAT's SPECIFIED IN THE FOLLOWUP LINE. Twit. .>} Now, any followups to >} THIS message will only get posted to talk.bizarre, > > Actually, you're completely wrong again. They'll also get cross-posted >to rec.games.frp as well, by default. People with some sense can modify >the newsgroup distribution to something appropriate. See above. Next time, READ THE DOCS, IDIOT. > >} so go ahead and try to f >} flame. We shall toast you, roast you, and eat you for breakfast. > > Yet another error (* Could there be more? *) My melting point is very high. >The net can't conduct temperatures hot enough to roast me. > >} Next time, read the bleedin' messages before you followup. Mebbe then >} you'll gain a sense of history...as in, What Has Gone Before. > > Some folks have better things to do than to read 700 pages of talk.bizarre. >I guess you don't. > >} John Actually, with this latest twit, it's not even necessary to flame. His screwup speaks for itself. This person has been marked for deletion. I just wish that these net.bleeding.idiots.who.don't.know.how.to.use net.software.and.that.take.their.monickers.from.rec.idiots.who.like.stardreck would go back into the slime from which they came. >} >} >} >} -- >} >} 0-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-> All disclaimers apply; I didn't write this <-=-=-=-=-=-0 >} | ----------------------|------------------- | >} | "Sing us a song, you're the Piano Man | John Mesiavech | >} | Sing us a Song Tonight | net.soldier.of.fortune | >} | For we're all in the mood for a melody | {backbone}!gryphon!jdm | >} | And you've got us feeling allright" | Go Purdue! (by req) | >} | - Billy Joel, "Piano Man" | | >} 0-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-0 > > Not only are you a fool, but your .signature is too long. > > - Steve "I got no .signature" Benz > mrspock@hubcap.clemson.edu > ...!gatech!hubcap!mrspock Wow. A signature flame. How original. How creative. Hope you didn't strain what little brain you have.... John (And, just for you, here it is ONCE AGAIN!) -- 0-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-> All disclaimers apply; I didn't write this <-=-=-=-=-=-0 | ----------------------|------------------- | | "Sing us a song, you're the Piano Man | John Mesiavech | | Sing us a Song Tonight | net.soldier.of.fortune | | For we're all in the mood for a melody | {backbone}!gryphon!jdm | | And you've got us feeling allright" | Go Purdue! (by req) | | - Billy Joel, "Piano Man" | | 0-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-0