[comp.sys.sun] Opus Systems

how@uunet.uu.net (Mike Howard) (12/05/90)

Does anyone have anything pro or con to say about OPUS Systems and their
products?

We are planning a very small sparc network and are considering using an
OPUS PM/5000 for a server [our VAR is pushing it], but want to hear
whatever rumors are circulating about the company and their products.

Mike Howard
uunet!milhow1!how or how%milhow1@uunet.uu.net

ken@dali.gatech.edu (Ken Seefried iii) (12/09/90)

In article <613@brchh104.bnr.ca> milhow1!how@uunet.uu.net (Mike Howard) writes:

>Does anyone have anything pro or con to say about OPUS Systems and their
>products?

Opus has been around for quite a while (in computer industry years; 1
computer industry year == 10 any-other-industry year ;').  

They started out making a line of PC plug-in boards, using the National
Semi 32000 series CPU's, that put Unix in your PC.  The line has evolved
to include all the 32000-series chips, an 88000-based product, a
SPARC-based product, and if I'm not mistaken, a Clipper-based product.

More recently, they worked with VLSI to produce the SPARCkit clone (they
did the board and ROMs).  I liked the little 32032-based Unix board I
played with...

	ken seefried iii
	ken@dali.gatech.edu

tyager@decpa.pa.dec.com (Tom Yager) (12/09/90)

I've worked with three generations of OPUS products (Clipper, 88K, SPARC)
and can say without hesitation that OPUS is a quality outfit. I got my
OPUS SPARC clone a couple of weeks ago, but am waiting for an upgrade of
disk and memory before I put it into full operation. The system is
shipping only in very limited quantities right now.

I'm under non-disclosure on some of the details of the system (perhaps
someone who isn't can shed more light without legal risk), but my
experience with it so far is that it is very stable, very compatible and
will be priced competitively.

From a potential purchaser's point of view, OPUS has two significant
advantages over some of the other clone vendors. First, they did their own
motherboard and OS work; they didn't just repackage someone else's
hardware or software. This is their style, and I've never seen a company
respond so quickly to reported problems. Second, my experiences with their
tech support have been smooth. Everyone I've ever gotten on the phone
there knows their stuff, and knows how to get to the bottom of a problem.

OPUS will be offering their SPARC line in three forms: motherboard only,
complete system and PC add-in card (!). The PC card has its own on-board
SCSI controller, and even has SBus expansion slots.

I have, as you can tell, tremendous respect for OPUS. I'll hold off on
offering an opinion about the quality of this equipment until I've
finished my tests, and written the BYTE review. I do expect good things
from them, however, and have no hesistation about recommending them as a
quality vendor.  (ty)

+--Tom Yager, Technical Editor, BYTE----Freelance writer-------------------+
|  UUCP: decvax!maxx!tyager          NET: maxx!tyager@bytepb.byte.com      |
|  "Get hipper...with flippers!"                                           |
+-------------Dr. Dude & Assoc.------I speak only for myself.--------------+

how@uunet.uu.net (Mike Howard) (12/19/90)

Here are the `informative' responses to my query about Opus Systems.

I have also talked to the company and received from them copies of several
press releases and a write up entitled 'Opus Systems/Corporate
Backgrounder'.  This material substantiates and augments the information
below - in other words, looks good to me.

In any case, we've decided to go with an Opus Sparcstation clone rather
than a Sun Sparcserver 1.  I expect the hardware to show up here `one of
these days', so in a few months I'll probably have some stories to tell.

=======================================================================

X-From: Glenn F. Leavell <uunet!rigel.econ.uga.edu!glenn>

I personally don't have any experience or knowledge of OPUS Systems or
their products, but I wanted to let you know that there is a short article
about them in the December 1990 (V3,N6) issue of "SunTech Journal" on
pages 8-10.  Below is a chart taken directly from that article:

[msh - the article is essentially a product announcement in the section
`/news'.  There is not much more there than is on the company's `slicks']

============================================================================

X-From: uunet!imatron!lawson (Lawson Louie [c100])

Prior to building Sparc compatible computers, Opus Systems was in the
business of designing and building boards utilizing various
microprocessors (e.g. NS32XXX, Fairchild Clipper and most recently the
Motorola 88K as part of 88open) which would turn your PC-AT into a Sys V
Unix workstation.  Back in the days when the best PC you could buy was a 6
mhz AT, and the best Sun you could buy was a Sun 2/120 ($45k !!!), their
technology was a viable solution for certain applications. Needless to
say, the 386 and Sparc put a certain damper on their corporate prospects
so they seem to have recast themselves into a Sparc and Unix provider.

As i understand the situation, they designed their SS1+ cpu board and also
helped a very large proportion of the current bevy of Sparc compatible
vendors with their SunOs integration/certification.

Though Opus is much smaller than the PC clone vendors who are offering
Sparc compatibles, Opus definitely has the better Unix experience and
expertise. 

In a previous life, I helped to develop a CAE product that ran on the
original NS32XXX based Opus product(s). Though I have a contact within
Opus I am not employed, a stockholder or otherwise affiliated with them. I
do understand where they are coming from and think that they can be a
viable vendor in this market.

============================================================================

[[Ed's Note: Previously posted replies removed from summary. -bdg]]

Mike Howard
uunet!milhow1!how or how%milhow1@uunet.uu.net