[net.unix-wizards] configuring and booting 4.1bsd

dav@berkeley@csuf.UUCP (08/10/83)

I'll let others answer your first 4 questions...  I'll tackle these.

	E) - After editing my own configuration file and running /etc/config on
	it and "make depend", I ran "make" and was told at the very end:
	 loading vmunix
	 rearranging symbols
	 2 symbol(s) not found:
	 _dh11
	 _ndh11
	
	     My question is, should I care?  I don't think I have a DH-11.  Am
	I wrong?  Do I have to have a DH-11?  Should I be able to boot from
	that configuration?

I also have a vax with no dh's, and I also get the exact same error message.
It has never caused me any problems...  I'm curious to find out what other
people have to say about it.
I suspect that we could include a DH in our config file, which of course
wouldn't be found at boot time, and it would make the error message go away.
	
	F) - Why, when I first booted from tape, was I told "Version 4.2" and
	later, when I brought up (sorta) multi-user, "Berkeley 4.1 VAX/UNIX
	(Amnesia-Vax)" and where did the "Amnesia-Vax" come from and how do I
	change it?

I'm not sure where the 4.2 came from - but the Amnesia-Vax (so named because
you are supposed to make it forget that it was Amnesia-Vax I guess) is
from /usr/include/whoami.h and/or /usr/include/ident.h.  This is mentioned
somewhere in that installation paper.
	
	G) - What getty code signifies a tty line that is 9600-1200-300
	baud (order not critical, other may be included)?  Or, where should I
	look for the getty source?  (what dir?)

What an interesting collection of speeds on the same line...
There is no char in the standard getty for those, but they are very easy
to add.  The code for getty (and all other commands on the system) is
in /usr/src/cmd.  It should be self-explanatory.

			David L. Markowitz
			Rockwell International
			...!ucbvax!{ucivax,trw-unix}!csuf!dav

thomas@utah-gr.UUCP (Spencer W. Thomas) (08/14/83)

We have no DZ on our vax systems.  We get the same message from the vmunix
make, except it complains about a dz-something-or-other symbol.  My
understanding is that ucb is being clever here, and putting frequently
accessed symbols near the front of the namelist, so ps and friends will
run faster.  The rearrangement program looks for certain symbols, and if
it doesn't find them, complains.  Nothing to worry about.

=Spencer

mcg@shark.UUCP (Steven McGeady) (08/15/83)

The bit with '_dh11' and '_ndh11' not found is a result of the work
of 'rearranging symbols' as the log file prints out. In some file,
(I believe /sys/sys/symbols.raw or some such) there is a list of
symbols which should be moved to the top of the symbol table of
the kernel to make things like ps(1) run faster. Those symbols
are included in that file, and the symbol-orderer will bitch if
they aren't in your kernel. This causes no problems, although
pstat(8), ps(1), and a number of other utilities don't know about
DMF's (or VMZ's). These need to be changed to work right with the
new devices.

S. McGeady
Tektronix, Inc.

z@cca.UUCP (Steve Zimmerman) (08/15/83)

If you want to get rid of these error messages about dh's, you can
comment out the dh symbols in the files symbols.raw and symbols.sort
in the sys directory.

	Steve Zimmerman