qmrward@uqvax.cc.uq.oz.au (06/13/91)
Are there any reliability or compatibility problems with Solbourne systems in comparison to Suns ?? Please post replies. Chris Ward QIMR Brisbane AUSTRALIA E-mail QMRWARD@UQVAX.CC.UQ.EDU.AU
seamans@seaimage.nlm.nih.gov (James R. Seamans) (06/28/91)
In article <3808@brchh104.bnr.ca> qmrward@uqvax.cc.uq.oz.au writes: >Are there any reliability or compatibility problems with Solbourne systems >in comparison to Suns ?? > >Please post replies. > >Chris Ward >QIMR >Brisbane AUSTRALIA >E-mail QMRWARD@UQVAX.CC.UQ.EDU.AU We currently have three Solbourne S4000 systems ( one week old ) running in a heavy Sun envirnoment. If you ignore that they are still using OS 4.0.3, the systems slid into the network without a hitch. This was in all aspects, NIS, printers, NFS the works. We are expecting OS 4.1 by the end of June which will aleivate some software incompatibility problems in the libraries. ============================================================= Jim Seamans seamans@nlm.nih.gov High Resolution Medical Imaging Group (HRMIG) National Library of Medicine - National Institutes of Health Bldg 38A RM 712 8600 Rockville Pike Bethesda, MD 20894 (voice) 301 496-4441 (fax) 301 402-0118 -- ============================================================= Jim Seamans seamans@nlm.nih.gov High Resolution Medical Imaging Group (HRMIG) National Library of Medicine - National Institutes of Health